Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Report [for k, v in set: k] as anti-pattern diagnostic #1609

Open
3 tasks
Tracked by #368
radeksimko opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks
Tracked by #368

Report [for k, v in set: k] as anti-pattern diagnostic #1609

radeksimko opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@radeksimko
Copy link
Member

Language Server Version

v0.32.6

Problem Statement

Users can today use the following syntax to loop over a set:

variable "set" {
  type    = set(string)
  default = ["aaa", "bbb"]
}

output "test" {
  value = [for key, val in var.set : key]
}

This is functionally equivalent to

variable "set" {
  type    = set(string)
  default = ["aaa", "bbb"]
}

output "test" {
  value = [for key, val in var.set : val]
}

In other words, looping over "set keys" is allowed but sets are not sorted (hence don't have indexes like lists or tuples) and don't really have their own keys either (like maps or objects).

Therefore, out of the two examples, only the bottom one should be considered best practice.

Attempted Solutions

No response

Proposal

  • Report looping over set keys as warning diagnostic
  • Provide quick fix code action to replace key with value reference

Related LSP methods

No response

References

No response

Help Wanted

  • I'm interested in contributing a fix myself

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment
@radeksimko radeksimko added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant