producer's bound seems to be inferred incorrectly #6819
Unanswered
zhouwangpei123
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
There's nothing in your schedule that tells Halide that
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
The size of output_a is the same as output_b. when i do tiles( each tile is 512x32 ), I expecte the buffer allocated for w_sum_wsz(which is the producer for both output_a and output_b) is (512+window_size) x (32 + window_size). But from stmt file, it seems that the buffer size allocated for each tile is (output_b.extent.0 + window_size) * (32 + window_size).
code example:
part of stmt file
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions