Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Incorrect dimension using separate GW/SW cascades #24

Open
garnerc opened this issue Nov 5, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Incorrect dimension using separate GW/SW cascades #24

garnerc opened this issue Nov 5, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
Terminal Lake Issues related to testing of implementation of a terminal lake in GSFLOW using gsflow-arcpy

Comments

@garnerc
Copy link
Contributor

garnerc commented Nov 5, 2018

@cgmorton
ncascdgw is equal to ncascade in the calibration_parameters.param file. cascade.param has different dimensions for each. Produces non-cascading groundwater reservoirs at gsflow-prms_only runtime.
@garnerc garnerc added the Terminal Lake Issues related to testing of implementation of a terminal lake in GSFLOW using gsflow-arcpy label Nov 5, 2018
@cgmorton
Copy link
Contributor

cgmorton commented Nov 9, 2018

@garnerc I think I have this fixed in the master branch. Would you mind trying it out and seeing if this fixes the problem. I changed the prms_template_fill to read the crt_gw_work folder dimensions file for the ncascdgw parameter instead of the crt_work folder file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Terminal Lake Issues related to testing of implementation of a terminal lake in GSFLOW using gsflow-arcpy
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@cgmorton @garnerc