In the program “GnssProcessing”, for parameter: staticPositions, I added the noNetScaleSigma option #243
IamLittleMonster
started this conversation in
Show and tell
In the program “GnssProcessing”, for parameter: staticPositions, I added the noNetScaleSigma option
#243
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
Hi Hongzhan, Thank you very much for your contribution. I have added your source to our main branch. I hope this is in your interest. I have only changed the default value to 0 so that old scripts do not change. Best regards |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Good job ~ |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
In the current version, I found that there is no separate constraint for the scale parameter when constraining staticPositions.
Therefore, based on the content on page 143 of https://openlib.tugraz.at/reprocessing-multiple-gnss-constellations-and-a-global-station-network-from-1994-to-2020-with-the-raw-observation-approach-2022, I have added relevant sections. Correspondingly, the noNetScaleSigma option has been added to determine the degree of constraint tightness.
The following is the modified code:
code.zip
I hope developers can incorporate this change into their next development plan. Additionally, I welcome anyone interested in this area to communicate with me^-^
Cheers,
Hongzhan
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions