Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix whitespace in .proto file #489

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2024
Merged

Conversation

chadselph
Copy link
Contributor

There was a couple of places the } indentation was obviously wrong on the site, I first noticed it on SelectedTrips (see screenshot). I found this to be confusing.

When I applied the protobuf formatter to the file it also fixed some misc. issues like tabs, spaces around = for the deprecated annotation, and trailing whitespace. I'm not as opinionated about these things, but I did find precedent for cleaning them up.

Screenshot 2024-08-08 at 10 48 49

@eliasmbd eliasmbd added Status: Discussion Issues and Pull Requests that are currently being discussed and reviewed by the community. Change: Editorial Inconsequential changes to the specification such as link updates, grammatical errors, formatting. Support: Needs Review Needs support to review proposal. GTFS Realtime Issues and Pull Requests that focus on GTFS Realtime labels Aug 29, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@tzujenchanmbd tzujenchanmbd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @chadselph!

@tzujenchanmbd tzujenchanmbd merged commit 9de0875 into google:master Oct 21, 2024
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Change: Editorial Inconsequential changes to the specification such as link updates, grammatical errors, formatting. GTFS Realtime Issues and Pull Requests that focus on GTFS Realtime Status: Discussion Issues and Pull Requests that are currently being discussed and reviewed by the community. Support: Needs Review Needs support to review proposal.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants