Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[4.3] Revert "Unexpose UtilityFunctions::is_instance_valid()" #1592

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 23, 2024
Merged

[4.3] Revert "Unexpose UtilityFunctions::is_instance_valid()" #1592

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
9 changes: 0 additions & 9 deletions binding_generator.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2166,12 +2166,6 @@ def generate_utility_functions(api, output_dir):
header.append("public:")

for function in api["utility_functions"]:
if function["name"] == "is_instance_valid":
# The `is_instance_valid()` function doesn't work as developers expect, and unless used very
# carefully will cause crashes. Instead, developers should use `ObjectDB::get_instance()`
# with object ids to ensure that an instance is still valid.
continue

vararg = "is_vararg" in function and function["is_vararg"]

function_signature = "\t"
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2206,9 +2200,6 @@ def generate_utility_functions(api, output_dir):
source.append("")

for function in api["utility_functions"]:
if function["name"] == "is_instance_valid":
continue

vararg = "is_vararg" in function and function["is_vararg"]

function_signature = make_signature("UtilityFunctions", function)
Expand Down
Loading