More nomenclature issues: particle_id_pair

[Jintram]

This apparently has nothing to do with a pair in the sense of an eGFRD particle pair in a domain. It just holds particle info.

[YetAnotherTomek]

Hi,

yes, we know that issue, this naming is indeed somewhat unfortunate. The
reason is that there is a boost object called pair which is just a pair
of two objects of arbitrary different type. particle_id_pair is using
this structure. The name however is misleading. They should have named
it particle_id_tuple or something similar. But changing this now all
over the code will be tricky...

Regards

Tomek

On 05/13/2011 04:50 PM, Jintram wrote:

This apparently has nothing to do with a pair in the sense of an eGFRD particle pair in a domain. It just holds particle info.

[thomie]

particle_id_tuple would be a better name

On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Jintram <
[email protected]>wrote:

This apparently has nothing to do with a pair in the sense of an eGFRD
particle pair in a domain. It just holds particle info.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#9