Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate expression boundaries #106

Open
pfeducode opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Integrate expression boundaries #106

pfeducode opened this issue Apr 10, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@pfeducode
Copy link

I found that in your work, facial expressions are generated by specifying numerical values. I tried to transfer the expression boundaries of IdInvert, but I found that it seemed to have no effect. In IdInvert, the dimension of the emoticon boundary is [1,14,512]. I noticed that in your boundary file, all attribute dimensions are [1,512].I tried to integrate the dimensions of [1,14,512] into the form of [1,512] according to the second dimension, but I found that after integration, the expression did not change. The code is as follows:
expression_boundary.shape#[1,14,512] manipulate_layers=[2,3,4,5] expression=np.mean(expression_boundary[:manipulate_layers,:],exis=1) np.save("expression.npy",expression)

@pfeducode pfeducode changed the title I found that in your work, facial expressions are generated by specifying numerical values. I tried to transfer the expression boundaries of IDInvert, but I found that it seemed to have no effect. In IDInvert, the dimension of the emoticon boundary is [1,14512]. I noticed that in your boundary file, all attribute dimensions are [1512] Integrate expression boundaries Apr 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant