You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hi,first I need to say arch is very very performance and convenient to use!
memorypack from cysharp support source generator for unity,so may arch also support it. and it is also good for sterilization!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well i have choosen Messagepack over Memorypack because Memorypack requires a lot for sourcegen.
All arch internal structs and classes would have to be annotated with the attributes and thus memorypack would have to reside directly in arch instead of it being an extension. This would only unnecessarily bloat arch itself and defeat the core aspect of arch. Arch itself is supposed to be bare-minimum.
Messagepack is only a little slower than memorypack, so I would find it unnecessary to upgrade to it. If you still want to have memorypack, you can easily fork arch and add that yourself ^^
hi,first I need to say arch is very very performance and convenient to use!
memorypack from cysharp support source generator for unity,so may arch also support it. and it is also good for sterilization!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: