Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consistency checks #24

Open
nichtich opened this issue Aug 26, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Consistency checks #24

nichtich opened this issue Aug 26, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@nichtich
Copy link
Member

Existing trusted mappings should be analysed for consistency. E.g.

  • If there is a mapping α = β or α < β then there must not be a mapping β > α

  • If there is a mapping α > β then there must not be a mapping α = β or α < β

  • For every mapping α = β or α < β if β (α ≤ β) has no narrower classes then for all transitively narrower classes γ of α there is an implicit mapping γ < β. If a counter-case of a transitively narrower classe γ of α is found where the mapping relation γ < β does not hold, then the mapping α = β oder α < β must be wrong.

In short, the network of KOS hierarchy and mapping relations must be a partial order (poset) or directed acyclic graph (DAG).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant