You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi nanom6a team! I noticed that you used m6A sites identified by miCLIP from public data (Nanopore direct RNA sequencing maps the complexity of Arabidopsis mRNA processing and m6A modification) in Fig.3a of your paper, and the number of m6A sites identified by miCLIP is 4685, however in paper Nanopore direct RNA sequencing maps the complexity of Arabidopsis mRNA processing and m6A modification that numbr is 93046. I'd want to know how you got 4685 m6A sites from 93046 site?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi yubang! Your script (seq=loader.fetch(chro,pos-5,pos+5)) meant that you will save sites if the flanking 5bp (11bp in total) contains RRACH, though the flanking 2bp (5bp in total) may not == RRACH?
Hi nanom6a team! I noticed that you used m6A sites identified by miCLIP from public data (Nanopore direct RNA sequencing maps the complexity of Arabidopsis mRNA processing and m6A modification) in Fig.3a of your paper, and the number of m6A sites identified by miCLIP is 4685, however in paper Nanopore direct RNA sequencing maps the complexity of Arabidopsis mRNA processing and m6A modification that numbr is 93046. I'd want to know how you got 4685 m6A sites from 93046 site?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: