You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is it possible to have the vec4 and mat4 in simd with AVX2 and keep the vec3 and mat3 without simd?
If so, can we still construct a vec4 with a vec3 + a float?
Is it possible to have a vec3 simd and a not simd in the same project?
I ask this question because adding GLM_FORCE_INTRINSICS and GLM_FORCE_DEFAULT_ALIGNED_GENTYPES to have the AVX2 optimizations gives me vec3s of size 4, which is annoying for my vertex buffer (table of vec3).
I can't find many examples of good simd practices, especially since the simd_vec4 type is removed.
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello.
Is it possible to have the vec4 and mat4 in simd with AVX2 and keep the vec3 and mat3 without simd?
If so, can we still construct a vec4 with a vec3 + a float?
Is it possible to have a vec3 simd and a not simd in the same project?
I ask this question because adding GLM_FORCE_INTRINSICS and GLM_FORCE_DEFAULT_ALIGNED_GENTYPES to have the AVX2 optimizations gives me vec3s of size 4, which is annoying for my vertex buffer (table of vec3).
I can't find many examples of good simd practices, especially since the simd_vec4 type is removed.
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: