Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
-
In principle it would be easy for compile a firmware which just runs as a 8580 (without config tool and other extras). Also power is not an issue as the SKpico only uses 5V (6581 and 8580 differ in the secondary voltage which is unused here). The only thing I'm a bit reluctant: the bus communication is tested to work in C64 and C128, and in principle there might be timings which are within the specs of the original SID, but not covered by the current firmware. Do you have any details on the synth? I assume it's nothing I could easily get hands on? :-) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks for the reply. That helps! Here's info about the synth: http://www.ucapps.de/midibox_sid.html I'm not sure it says anything about timing differences, but that's way over my head anyway. ;) Also, is PCBway the only way to make the SKpico2040DAC, or is something like JLCPCB an option as well? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Not wanting to hijack the discussion nor pushing my project, but my project is tested with SKPico and features a configurable midi device (finishing up the code). I hope to release the pcb in the coming weeks. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have a hardware DIY standalone MIDI synth that uses an original 6581 and I'm looking to replace it with a modern alternative. The SIDKick seems to be the ideal solution, but I had a few questions.
Is the SKpico2040DAC what I'm looking for? I prefer a direct drop-in replacement without sourcing a Raspberry Pi, external wiring, audio jacks, etc.
I don't have an original c64 and I just need a standard 8580 output without bells and whistles. Am I still able to set configurations/8580 settings?
Should I concern myself with power settings, etc? Anything else I should know when using this outside of a c64 environment?
Thanks in advance.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions