You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If the Java parser bumps into such a qualified new operator it fails inevitably:
error.syntax in file "D:\SW-Produkte\Structorizer\tests\Issue1132_Java_import\parsers\COBOLParser.java"
Preceding source context:
5762: {
5763: // START KGU#537 2018-07-01: Enh. #553
5764: checkCancelled();
5765: // END KGU#537 2018-07-01
5766: if (_reduction.isEmpty()) {
5767: return;
5768: }
5769:
5770: // create a dummy-program because we may have only a partial source that doesn't start with
+ program definition
5771: if (currentProg == null) {
5772: currentProg = cobTools.» new CobProg(STRUCTORIZER_PARTIAL, null, false, null);
Found token new
Expected: Identifier
A grammar modification will be necessary to solve this problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is no simple solution at hand (except that the preprocessor would simply delete the class path prefix), but the occurrence of qualified new operators seems unlikely enough to leave it as is.
For see instantiation of nested static classes a qualified
new
operator may be needed (see e.g. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2863157/how-does-object_new-work-does-java-have-a-new-operator).If the Java parser bumps into such a qualified
new
operator it fails inevitably:A grammar modification will be necessary to solve this problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: