You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During my usage, I noticed that the yaw range of the images is defined as -360° to 360°, rather than the conventional 0° to 360° range. I am perplexed by this design decision and would like to understand the reasoning behind it.
Could you kindly explain why you chose to define the yaw angle within the range of -360° to 360°? Are there any specific technical or practical requirements that led to this setting? Furthermore, what implications does this variation have on data processing and analysis compared to the traditional 0° to 360° range?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
During my usage, I noticed that the yaw range of the images is defined as -360° to 360°, rather than the conventional 0° to 360° range. I am perplexed by this design decision and would like to understand the reasoning behind it.
Could you kindly explain why you chose to define the yaw angle within the range of -360° to 360°? Are there any specific technical or practical requirements that led to this setting? Furthermore, what implications does this variation have on data processing and analysis compared to the traditional 0° to 360° range?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: