You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
With the refactor we are losing the capacity to know what a particular device contains in a quick way (i.e. SCK2.1 + CO2).
The blueprint concept allowed us to make device configurations and put a name on them, but it's rigidity did not allow for adding and removing sensors dynamically.
Considering this, it would be good to come up with a way to generate a hash from the sensors that are active in a certain device that could allow us to filter devices, or to generate names for that. A little bit like the concept of a blueprint, but a dynamic one, which can change per device without the user having to do anything with it.
The hash could be checked for certain sensors (i.e. sensors that have ancestries for instance) in order to determine a friendly name. For instance, a device SCK 2.2 could be turned into SCK 2.2 + CO2 because the sensor_hash contains a sensor that maps to a sensor_ancestry (or in itself) whose friendly name is CO2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
With the
refactor
we are losing the capacity to know what a particular device contains in a quick way (i.e. SCK2.1 + CO2).The blueprint concept allowed us to make device configurations and put a name on them, but it's rigidity did not allow for adding and removing sensors dynamically.
Considering this, it would be good to come up with a way to generate a hash from the sensors that are active in a certain device that could allow us to filter devices, or to generate
names
for that. A little bit like the concept of a blueprint, but a dynamic one, which can change per device without the user having to do anything with it.The
hash
could be checked for certain sensors (i.e. sensors that have ancestries for instance) in order to determine a friendly name. For instance, a deviceSCK 2.2
could be turned intoSCK 2.2
+CO2
because thesensor_hash
contains asensor
that maps to asensor_ancestry
(or in itself) whose friendly name isCO2
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: