You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 2, 2023. It is now read-only.
I won’t break new ground here but it is impossible to see how this isn’t DRM for browsers that forces more ads and tracking on people. There is no benefit to website visitors and users, only to advertisers.
The ethics underlying this are, at best, highly suspect. The framing is entirely disingenuous.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Agreed. Google has to respond with a "no-nonsense" statement about trying to take away user's freedom here.
This is not looking good. We are now miles away from a free world wide web.
(Actually W3C already pushed the envelope some years ago when Tim claimed that DRM is necessary, and now Google wings it further by forcing it onto the users rendering them without control. That is making the browser itself a weapon for forcing unwanted content onto the user. It's now like a virus.)
This CL moves the base::Feature from content_features.h to
a generated feature from runtime_enabled_features.json5.
This means that the base::Feature can be default-enabled
while the web API is controlled by the RuntimeFeature, which will
still be default-disabled.
An origin trial can enable the RuntimeFeature, which will
allow full access to the API, provided the base::Feature is also
enabled (see change to origin_trial_context.cc).
Meanwhile, the base::Feature can be disabled through Finch as a
kill-switch for the whole feature, and prevent origin trials
from turning the feature on.
Tests have been added to WebView test, as it allowed for easy
spoofing of responses on a known origin.
Bug: 1439945
Change-Id: Ifa0f5d4f5e0a0bf882dd1b0207698dddd6f71420
Fixed: b/278701736
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/4681552
Reviewed-by: Rayan Kanso <[email protected]>
Commit-Queue: Peter Pakkenberg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Richard Coles <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kinuko Yasuda <[email protected]>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1173344}
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I won’t break new ground here but it is impossible to see how this isn’t DRM for browsers that forces more ads and tracking on people. There is no benefit to website visitors and users, only to advertisers.
The ethics underlying this are, at best, highly suspect. The framing is entirely disingenuous.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: