You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@najuzilu is there a reason for not supporting label option for proof:proof. It seems that you're suggesting to use tags (i.e. (tag-here)=) syntax provided by myst
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I noticed that proofs are not referenced as often as theorems, corollaries, and conjectures. Since they're not numbered either (which is common for LaTeX proofs), I couldn't decide what the default link text would look like when referenced. Tags on the other hand, don't have a default link text so the user would have to provide it.
I am open to adding a label option for proofs. What do you think the default link text would look like?
One possibility could be "Proof of Theorem #" where the label provided in the proof directive could be the label of its theorem directive.
What do you think the default link text would look like?
Hmm -- not sure. You make good points re: targets / tag approach and default link text. Given there is no title text or default numbering your approach might be the best.
I guess if we were to add it then perhaps it would switch on numbering by default and use that.
@najuzilu is there a reason for not supporting
label
option forproof:proof
. It seems that you're suggesting to use tags (i.e.(tag-here)=
) syntax provided bymyst
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: