You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I’m creating a corpus of critical editions and I decided to use XInclude in order to show all the texts in a single EVT edition. Each text of my corpus has been transmitted by different manuscripts and I’ve declared them in a dedicated listWit.
However, XInclude does not recognise the different manuscript groups, so all witnesses appear in the tradition of all texts, like in the following example:
The text has been transmitted my mss B and D, whereas the others belong to the tradition of another text of the corpus.
At the moment, a partial solution to the overlapping of manuscript traditions is to specify the @wit in the lem element: this way, in the apparatus of the critical edition you won’t find the readings of mss that are not part of the tradition of a given text:
However, in the collation mode XInclude still shows all witnesses:
And if I open one of the witnesses available which is not part of my apparatus, it shows the reading of the main ms, (i. e. of B in this case):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
RobertoRDT
changed the title
Compatibility with XInclude
Separate <listWit> merged when using XInclude for multiple critical editions
Jan 30, 2024
RobertoRDT
changed the title
Separate <listWit> merged when using XInclude for multiple critical editions
Separate <listWit>s merged when using XInclude for multiple critical editions
Jan 30, 2024
Hi, I’m creating a corpus of critical editions and I decided to use XInclude in order to show all the texts in a single EVT edition. Each text of my corpus has been transmitted by different manuscripts and I’ve declared them in a dedicated listWit.
However, XInclude does not recognise the different manuscript groups, so all witnesses appear in the tradition of all texts, like in the following example:
The text has been transmitted my mss B and D, whereas the others belong to the tradition of another text of the corpus.
At the moment, a partial solution to the overlapping of manuscript traditions is to specify the @wit in the lem element: this way, in the apparatus of the critical edition you won’t find the readings of mss that are not part of the tradition of a given text:
However, in the collation mode XInclude still shows all witnesses:
And if I open one of the witnesses available which is not part of my apparatus, it shows the reading of the main ms, (i. e. of B in this case):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: