You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently in the Migrate-to-threshold branch we select t from n validators to sign a message deterministically by sorting the list of validators and taking the first t elements.
This is not good because it means we always select the same ones.
We need another way to do this. One suggestion is to go back to using message hash. But there were also concerns about rate limiting / DoS when using message hash.
If we tie this into the message passing issue (#1033) we may be able to get away with just having the relayer pick some random subset using OS randomness.
Currently in the
Migrate-to-threshold
branch we select t from n validators to sign a message deterministically by sorting the list of validators and taking the first t elements.This is not good because it means we always select the same ones.
We need another way to do this. One suggestion is to go back to using message hash. But there were also concerns about rate limiting / DoS when using message hash.
See also #859
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: