Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Efficient VOLE for one-shot zero-knowledge proofs #5

Open
weikengchen opened this issue Mar 26, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Efficient VOLE for one-shot zero-knowledge proofs #5

weikengchen opened this issue Mar 26, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@weikengchen
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is just to leave a note. It is mainly an engineering addition.

Currently, we generate the offline materials in big batches of N. This is because efficient LPN map K -> N is often "big".
Therefore, even if two parties are proving very small statements, the one-shot time is not small.

There are many solutions to this:

  1. When computing the LPN map K -> N, we instead just compute K -> N' where N' < N. The limitation is that it does not fully use K, and K could be smaller if one computes the parameters more carefully.

  2. Use the original OT extension.

Both might be worthwhile of looking.

@wangxiao1254
Copy link
Member

Using IKNP would be bad because the communication would be high (as high as ZKGC). It is possible to reconfigure the parameter to target smaller parameters but I don't think the improvement would be that high. Are you looking at a setting where parties just come, compute and leave? (which means the one-time setup also needs to be included in the overall cost?)

@weikengchen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, I was thinking about a one-time setup. (Note: indeed in my application the circuit would be already large, so K -> N' where N' < N may be the best solution).

@wangxiao1254
Copy link
Member

N is 10^7, and K is ~500000, I suppose your N' is between these two numbers then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants