Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Ironbank contacts #3663

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2023
Merged

Update Ironbank contacts #3663

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2023

Conversation

jlind23
Copy link
Contributor

@jlind23 jlind23 commented Oct 26, 2023

What does this PR do?

Why is it important?

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in ./changelog/fragments using the changelog tool
  • I have added an integration test or an E2E test

Author's Checklist

  • [ ]

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Use cases

Screenshots

Logs

Questions to ask yourself

  • How are we going to support this in production?
  • How are we going to measure its adoption?
  • How are we going to debug this?
  • What are the metrics I should take care of?
  • ...

@jlind23 jlind23 self-assigned this Oct 26, 2023
@jlind23 jlind23 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 26, 2023 15:06
@jlind23 jlind23 enabled auto-merge (squash) October 26, 2023 15:06
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Oct 26, 2023

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @jlind23? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-v./d./d./d is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit

NOTE: backport-skip has been added to this pull request.

@elastic-sonarqube
Copy link

SonarQube Quality Gate

Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Start Time: 2023-10-26T15:06:27.763+0000

  • Duration: 65 min 43 sec

Test stats 🧪

Test Results
Failed 0
Passed 6553
Skipped 59
Total 6612

💚 Flaky test report

Tests succeeded.

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

  • /package : Generate the packages.

  • run integration tests : Run the Elastic Agent Integration tests.

  • run end-to-end tests : Generate the packages and run the E2E Tests.

  • run elasticsearch-ci/docs : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

🌐 Coverage report

Name Metrics % (covered/total) Diff
Packages 98.824% (84/85) 👍
Files 66.885% (204/305) 👍
Classes 65.95% (368/558) 👍
Methods 53.041% (1160/2187) 👍
Lines 39.389% (13671/34708) 👍 0.029
Conditionals 100.0% (0/0) 💚

@jlind23 jlind23 merged commit e20912c into main Oct 26, 2023
23 of 25 checks passed
@jlind23 jlind23 deleted the jlind23-patch-2 branch October 26, 2023 17:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants