-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JSON_ARRAY JSON_VALUE returns #20
Comments
The lib sticks to the JSON specification, and the set of JSON values are limited. However, if this is possible, I invite you to send a pull request with what you have in mind, and maybe with an example. |
My point on this is
instead of having to redefine everything because they are anchored types!
|
Ad what would be the additional value of MY_JSON_VALUE ? |
None, actually I almost finished a pull request integrating the needs (or mines @least) for SCOOP integration. I'm in the process of testing them and will write you once done. MY_JSON_VALUE was done only in the case no changes could have been done to JSON_VALUE |
Trying to inherit from JSON_ARRAY I'd like to have a MY_JSON_VALUE used in all the routines, so much as parameter than as return type. Was there a reason to make those types anchored and not
like items.item
???Any way to refactor it?
Pull request??
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: