Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add client dtls connection ID (2.). #149

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

boaks
Copy link
Contributor

@boaks boaks commented Jun 25, 2022

Simple client side implementation indicates support and uses the cid of
the server, when negotiated by that.

Signed-off-by: Achim Kraus [email protected]

@boaks boaks mentioned this pull request Jun 25, 2022
@boaks boaks force-pushed the client_cid branch 4 times, most recently from fa939b1 to 0af8db6 Compare January 25, 2023 09:10
@boaks boaks force-pushed the client_cid branch 2 times, most recently from 4becf0b to 0272b27 Compare March 11, 2023 11:17
@boaks boaks force-pushed the client_cid branch 2 times, most recently from d8e717b to fb7a4aa Compare April 24, 2023 09:35
@boaks boaks force-pushed the client_cid branch 2 times, most recently from 3dabb24 to 4b60a6b Compare July 14, 2023 14:35
@boaks boaks added the available on develop Mark PRs (pre-)available only on develop label Feb 7, 2024
Simple client side implementation indicates support and uses the cid of
the server, when negotiated by that.

Signed-off-by: Achim Kraus <[email protected]>
@mrdeep1
Copy link
Contributor

mrdeep1 commented Sep 16, 2024

It would be good if a server side API could be added where the calling application can define the CID to use so that it can be tracked by the application to change the tuple to send back any response on.

@boaks
Copy link
Contributor Author

boaks commented Sep 16, 2024

server side API

As for now, tinydtls CID only supports the client side. To be more precise, the client only indicates to support CID, but doesn't use a CID on it's own side. For the next time I will not able to spend the required time to implement a server side. If that changes, the proposed API will make a lot of sense.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
available on develop Mark PRs (pre-)available only on develop
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants