Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small wording Issue in Digital Twin KIT #1055

Open
ClosedSourcerer opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Small wording Issue in Digital Twin KIT #1055

ClosedSourcerer opened this issue Oct 14, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@ClosedSourcerer
Copy link
Contributor

Registration of a new twin is (at least in Catena-X) equivalent to the creation of a new twin. Thus, a Data Provider
should always ensure that there is no AAS-descriptor created for the respective assetIds yet. If there already is one,
the submodel-descriptor should
be [added to the existing shell-descriptor](#registering-a-new-submodel-at-an-existing-twin).

Aside from the fact, that this could be a single LoC the wording does not make much sense to me.
Suggestion:
Registration of a new twin is (at least in Catena-X) equivalent to the creation of a new twin. Thus, a Data Provider should always ensure that an AAS-descriptor for the respective assetIds does not exist yet. If one exists, the submodel-descriptor should be [added to the existing shell-descriptor](#registering-a-new-submodel-at-an-existing-twin).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant