chore: avoid blocking codecov status checks

[danielpeintner]

see https://docs.codecov.com/docs#tips-and-tricks

fixes #1058

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1060 (c41e050) into master (0e6e117) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1060   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.38%   75.38%           
=======================================
  Files          80       80           
  Lines       15443    15443           
  Branches     1477     1477           
=======================================
  Hits        11641    11641           
  Misses       3766     3766           
  Partials       36       36           

[danielpeintner]

Question: Mhh, how can we check whether it does what we asked for?

In this PR there was no real change to complain 🤷‍♂️
Anyhow, it shows ✔ for the 2 codecov checks.. maybe just try it out once we merge it..

[relu91]

Let's try, but the question is when are we going to switch back to normal behaviour? after release?

[JKRhb]

Let's try, but the question is when are we going to switch back to normal behaviour? after release?

That sounds good :) Maybe we also try to increase code coverage a bit once we are done with the strict ts configs, then I think codecov will give a good incentive to always add tests when a new feature is integrated.