Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update latest release section for 0.47.0 #367

Open
Sreekala-Gopakumar opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 13 comments
Open

Update latest release section for 0.47.0 #367

Sreekala-Gopakumar opened this issue Sep 4, 2024 · 13 comments
Assignees

Comments

@Sreekala-Gopakumar
Copy link
Contributor

What's New update for the website, for 0.47.0 (September 2024)

@Sreekala-Gopakumar
Copy link
Contributor Author

First draft (0.46.0 content is live at https://www.eclipse.org/openj9). Note: this isn't an exhaustive list of all the changes, just the main ones:

Eclipse OpenJ9 version 0.47.0 released

September 2024

We're pleased to announce the availability of Eclipse OpenJ9™ v0.47.0.

This release supports OpenJDK 23. For more information about supported platforms and OpenJDK versions, see Supported environments.

Other updates in this release include the following:

  • The -Xshareclasses option automatically enables the -XX:+ShareOrphans option.

To read more about these and other changes, see the OpenJ9 user documentation.

Performance highlights include:

@Sreekala-Gopakumar Sreekala-Gopakumar self-assigned this Sep 4, 2024
@Sreekala-Gopakumar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pshipton @vijaysun-omr - Are there any performance updates that you want to highlight in the website?
Any other what's new update to be added here? Thanks!

@Sreekala-Gopakumar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pshipton @vijaysun-omr - Are there any performance updates that you want to highlight in the website? Any other what's new update to be added here? Thanks!

Any content to be added in the website for 0.47.0 release?

@pshipton
Copy link
Member

@tajila anything you want to add?

@pshipton
Copy link
Member

When we make the website change, I think we should add a 0.47 section above the 0.46 section, and keep both visible.

@Sreekala-Gopakumar
Copy link
Contributor Author

When we make the website change, I think we should add a 0.47 section above the 0.46 section, and keep both visible.

Any particular reason for that? I am asking because 0.46.0 was already published in August. So why retain it?

@pshipton
Copy link
Member

pshipton commented Sep 17, 2024

0.47 is not a replacement for 0.46, it's a new version. It's still useful to see the list of updates in 0.46 for users who are using a version before 23.

@Sreekala-Gopakumar
Copy link
Contributor Author

0.47 is not a replacement for 0.46, it's a new version. It's still useful to see the list of updates in 0.46 for users who are using a version before 23.

ok, can I take this as a reference for the future because from what I have seen we have never clubbed together two releases unless those releases were happening back-to-back.

For example, Release 0.41.0 supported OpenJDK 8, 11, and 17, while Release 0.42.0 supported only OpenJDK 21. Both these were not clubbed together.

@pshipton
Copy link
Member

An improvement for the future. :)

@Sreekala-Gopakumar
Copy link
Contributor Author

An improvement for the future. :)

Ok, so in future, if there is a release for a new version only, in the website, we will club it with the previous release updates. Thanks!

Sreekala-Gopakumar added a commit to Sreekala-Gopakumar/openj9-website-publish that referenced this issue Sep 17, 2024
eclipse-openj9/openj9-website#367

Updated latest release section for 0.47.0 in website. Clubbed it with the 0.46.1 release

Closes #367
Signed-off-by: Sreekala Gopakumar <[email protected]>
@Sreekala-Gopakumar
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pshipton - Please check and let me know if any changes are required. Thanks!

@pshipton
Copy link
Member

The draft looks fine to me.

@vijaysun-omr
Copy link
Contributor

It looks fine to me too. I don't have much to highlight beyond the shared classes behavior that was mentioned already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants