Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Doc of smoothness() looks quite empty #374

Open
etiennebacher opened this issue Mar 9, 2023 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #519
Open

Doc of smoothness() looks quite empty #374

etiennebacher opened this issue Mar 9, 2023 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #519
Assignees
Labels
Docs 📚 Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@etiennebacher
Copy link
Member

The current documentation of smoothness() looks quite empty:

image

I'm not familiar with it but is it possible to add a bit more details on the methods and some references other than a StackExchange post? For example, skewness() and kurtosis() are much more documented.

@etiennebacher etiennebacher added the Docs 📚 Improvements or additions to documentation label Mar 9, 2023
@DominiqueMakowski DominiqueMakowski self-assigned this Mar 9, 2023
@IndrajeetPatil
Copy link
Member

@DominiqueMakowski bump

@DominiqueMakowski
Copy link
Member

DominiqueMakowski commented Jun 24, 2024

Will do, thanks for the bump!

We could potentially relocate to data wizard along with other variable descriptors (albeit smoothness describes sequential series but still) Lol my bad I thought we were in modelbased ^^

DominiqueMakowski added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 24, 2024
@etiennebacher etiennebacher linked a pull request Jun 24, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Docs 📚 Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants