Version 1.0 API

[bhelx]

This issue is for collecting ideas and opinions about what our 1.0 API should look like. The primary focus is on the user-facing API. Though some decisions may have consequences for the internal APIs. We need to choose this direction and get out a beta in the coming months. From there we can iterate until we feel ready to public a 1.0. Once we can publish a stable API, we can start building some of the nicer layers on top and we can better support people in production.

This issue will have both a goals and a tasks section. I'll add items to both as we discuss in the team meetings and get a consensus on the ideas. Please issue your ideas and proposals as comments.

Goals

• Security
  • Are we doing our best to make it clear how to use Chicory securely?
  • Are there any footguns that might make it easy to apply an insecure pattern?
• Stability
  • Are we ensuring that our API allows all the things users may need to do?
  • Are we ensuring that our API can support future specs without breaking it?
• Familiarity and Compatibility
  • Are we borrowing from other runtimes as much as possible?
  • Will the API be familiar to someone who has used a Wasm runtime in anger before?
• Performance
  • We don't need the most performant interface
  • But does what we choose lock us into performance we cannot upgrade?
  • How can we bring performance improvements without interrupting users?

Tasks

TODO

[andreaTP]

I started looking at the HostImports interface from a user perspective and opened this RFC: #445

[andreaTP]

Additional task here, we should, at least verify, that we are not breaking Java's "module system" good practices for package naming etc.