should draft reports be on the publications website?

[katrin-berkenbusch]

For several reports (e.g., by Johanna Pierre) we have the draft final report and the final report on our website. I don't think we need the draft versions?

[simonwinter]

@katrin-berkenbusch are you able to point me to this? Is there anyway the code could help you here? Perhaps we can filter out any draft content when the site gets built, or is this mire a content creation/editing process that we should follow?

[katrin-berkenbusch]

Thanks @simonwinter I think it's a question for Ed if we want to include the draft final reports. We seem to have consistently done so; the draft final reports are published, usually with a presentation; they were part of the project and were tabled at the working group meetings, before they are then finalised. The draft reports are on the DOC website (where they get moved into another place after a while), so maybe it's fine for us to do so too?

[edwardabraham]

I think they could be removed. The only hesitation is that this will lead to dead links. So I think @simonwinter that the code could help to make that experience better. Thinking aloud, a good option could be to be able to add something to the YAML so that a post disappeared from the index (list of pubs, list of news, list or case studies etc), and from the sitemap, but still came up if someone visited it by clicking a link.