-
If Async.Parallel is called on seq, often we don't care about getting Even though pointers are small in size if I keep allocating array it's still creating garbage |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
Xyncgas
Oct 7, 2023
Replies: 1 comment
-
One way is covert Async seq by using Seq.iter(fun x -> x |> Async.start) |> ignore But I am still not sure if Async.parallel would actually create Array because that's dumb |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Answer selected by
Xyncgas
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
One way is covert Async seq by using
But I am still not sure if Async.parallel would actually create Array because that's dumb