Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docker scout false positive on [email protected] #81

Open
alexsuter opened this issue Dec 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Docker scout false positive on [email protected] #81

alexsuter opened this issue Dec 27, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@alexsuter
Copy link

Description

Docker scout treats [email protected] as vulnerable and reports that 4.0 has fixed the issue. But the CVE fix has been backported to 3.6.10 which is described in the CVE report in docker scout itself:

https://scout.docker.com/vulnerabilities/id/CVE-2016-2141/org/axonivy

JGroups before 4.0 does not require the proper headers for the ENCRYPT and AUTH protocols from nodes joining the cluster, which allows remote attackers to bypass security restrictions and send and receive messages within the cluster via unspecified vectors. Fixes for this issue have been backported to versions 3.6.10.Final and 3.2.16.Final.

Reproduce

Add jgroups 3.6.20 to the image and analyze it with docker scout.

Expected behavior

jgroups 3.6.20 should not be reported as vulnerable

docker version

not important

docker info

not important

Additional Info

No response

@alexsuter
Copy link
Author

I think it's because gitlab has the wrong versions ranges, where as github has the correct ones?

image

@thaJeztah
Copy link
Member

Thanks for reporting; looks like this is related to Scout, which is currently closed source, and not maintained in this repository. Issues related to scout are best reported in https://github.com/docker/scout-cli.

I'll transfer this ticket to that issue tracker 👍

@thaJeztah thaJeztah transferred this issue from docker/cli Jan 3, 2024
@cdupuis cdupuis self-assigned this Jan 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants