Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Annotate loop unwinding bounds via pragma #8431

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

Enable users to specify loop unwinding information directly in source code via #pragma CPROVER unwind N with some number N. This should be less susceptible to code changes than unwindsets that use loop numbers: those loop numbers may change when code outside the named loop is modified, e.g., when adding or removing other loops.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

Enable users to specify loop unwinding information directly in source
code via `#pragma CPROVER unwind N` with some number `N`. This should be
less susceptible to code changes than unwindsets that use loop numbers:
those loop numbers may change when code outside the named loop is
modified, e.g., when adding or removing other loops.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant