-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
Isobaric_Proteomics_Inspection.py
1212 lines (790 loc) · 30.6 KB
/
Isobaric_Proteomics_Inspection.py
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
#!/usr/bin/env python
# coding: utf-8
# # Checking the Quality of Isobaric Labeling Proteomics Data
# Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics has been emerging as a powerful variety of the modern high-throughput *omics* technologies. Superficial search on Pubmed yields [tens of thousands papers](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=proteomics%5BTitle%2FAbstract%5D+AND+%28%28mass+spectrometry%5BTitle%2FAbstract%5D%29+OR+%28LCMS%5BTitle%2FAbstract%5D%29%29+OR+%28LC-MS%5BTitle%2FAbstract%5D%29) where the MS-based proteomics is mentioned in the title or abstract, let alone the papers where in which is a humble workhorse hidden deep in the Methods section.<br>
# [Isobaric labeling-based proteomics](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isobaric_labeling#:~:text=Isobaric%20labeling%20is%20a%20mass,heavy%20isotopes%20around%20their%20structure.), including [Tandem mass tags (TMT)](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac0262560) technology, is an approach for multiplexed relative protein quantification that is based on chemical labeling of peptides with the set of the stable isotope-substituted reagents. For a given peptide, all reagents would yield the same total mass, but the signals with distinct masses (reporter ions) would be produced upon fragmentation during a tandem MS experiment. In 2021, the commercially available technology is offering to measure up to 16 samples simultaneously (for more technical information, see [the manual at the vendor's website](https://www.thermofisher.com/document-connect/document-connect.html?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.thermofisher.com%2FTFS-Assets%2FLSG%2Fmanuals%2FMAN0018773_TMTproMassTagLabelingReagentsandKits_UG.pdf&title=VXNlciBHdWlkZTogVE1UcHJvIE1hc3MgVGFnIExhYmVsaW5nIFJlYWdlbnRzIGFuZCBLaXRz)).
# Isobaric proteomic data is complex: proteolytic peptides should be identified, the reporter ions must be quantified, the quantification data should be normalized, peptide-level data should be assembled into the protein quantification results. There are plenty of things that may go wrong, thus the thorough inspection of the quality of the acquired isobaric labeling data. This notebook includes the range of command that help me out with checking the quality of the data. I will not go into the biological interpretation or anything like that, this is the inspection from the technical standpoint for the most part. The commands are adapted to the text output format provided by Proteome Discovere 2.4, but they can be adapted to the output from other data processing solutions.
# <h2>Import the libraries</h2>
# Install the dependencies below via *pip* *install* *package-name* if you do not yet have them on your machine.
# In[1]:
import os, glob
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import seaborn as sns
from sklearn.decomposition import PCA
sns.set(font_scale = 1.2)
sns.set_style('whitegrid')
sns.set_palette('muted')
# We could also go ahead and define a few useful functions that we're going to use along the way.
# In[2]:
def get_gene_name(descr):
try:
gn = descr.split('GN=')[1]
gn = gn.split(' ')[0]
except:
gn = ''
return gn
def variability_groupby(df, ratio_columns, accession_col='Accession',
use_peptides='all',shared_keyword='Shared', unique_infocol='Quan Info'):
if use_peptides == 'unique':
df = df[~df[unique_infocol].isin((shared_keyword,))].copy()
else:
pass
dfN = df[ ([accession_col,] + ratio_columns) ]
dfMeans = dfN.groupby([accession_col]).mean()
dfDev = dfN.groupby([accession_col]).std()
dfVar = np.divide(dfDev, dfMeans)
dfVar = dfVar*100
dfVar.replace(0, np.nan, inplace=True)
dfVar = dfVar.round(2)
return dfVar
def pca_on_columns(in_df, plotname, nComp=5, compToPlot=(0,1), figWidth = 8 ):
"""
Takes an expression table, with samples as columns and proteins in rows.
Figure width is set by the user,
figure height is derived automatically based on the scale of the PCs.
"""
samplenames = list(in_df.columns)
logdata = in_df.to_numpy()
X = logdata.transpose()
pca = PCA(n_components=nComp, svd_solver='arpack')
principalComponents = pca.fit_transform(X)
print('Variance explained by components:')
print(pca.explained_variance_ratio_)
pcaLoadings = pd.DataFrame(pca.components_.T,
columns=[ f'PC{n+1}' for n in range(nComp) ],
index=in_df.index)
pcColnames = []
for n in range(nComp):
pcColnames.append( f'PC {n+1} ({pca.explained_variance_ratio_[n]*100:.2f}%)' )
principalDf = pd.DataFrame(principalComponents,
columns = pcColnames)
principalDf['sample'] = samplenames
principalDf.set_index('sample', inplace = True)
#Find min and max values on x and y axes in order to detrmine the figsize
arrX = principalDf[ pcColnames[ compToPlot[0] ] ]
arrY = principalDf[ pcColnames[ compToPlot[1] ] ]
spanX = max(arrX) - min(arrX)
spanY = max(arrY) - min(arrY)
plotH = round(figWidth * spanY / spanX, 1)
print(f'Figure width set to {figWidth} and height to {plotH}')
f = plt.figure()
f.patch.set_facecolor('white')
ax1 = principalDf.plot.scatter(x=pcColnames[ compToPlot[0] ],
y=pcColnames[ compToPlot[1] ],
color='#213A8F',
s=50, alpha=0.7, figsize=(figWidth, plotH) )
ax1.axhline(color='grey', alpha=0.4, linestyle='--')
ax1.axvline(color='grey', alpha=0.4, linestyle='--')
for i, row in principalDf.iloc[:, list(compToPlot) ].iterrows():
ax1.annotate(i, row,
xytext=(10,-5), textcoords='offset points',
fontsize=12, color='#213A8F')
ax1.set_title(plotname, fontsize=16)
plt.grid(b=None)
#plt.show()
return principalDf, pcaLoadings
def rename_ratios(dfIn):
"""
Used for the file QuanSpectra
"""
renaming_dict = {}
for c in dfIn.columns:
if 'Abundances Normalized' in c:
new_name = c.split(' ')[-1]
new_name = 'Norm_' + new_name
renaming_dict[c] = new_name
elif 'Abundance ' in c:
new_name = c.split(' ')[-1]
renaming_dict[c] = new_name
dfOut = dfIn.rename(renaming_dict,axis='columns')
return dfOut
def rename_ratios4(dfIn):
"""
Adapted for Peptide Groups table
"""
renaming_dict = {}
for c in dfIn.columns:
if 'Abundance Ratio' in c:
new_name = c.split(' ')[-3] + '/' + c.split(' ')[-1]
renaming_dict[c] = new_name
elif 'Abundances Grouped' in c:
new_name = c.split(' ')[-1]
renaming_dict[c] = new_name
renaming_dict['Master Protein Accessions'] = 'Accession'
dfOut = dfIn.rename(renaming_dict,axis='columns')
return dfOut
# <h2>Take a look at the output files from Proteome Discoverer</h2>
# The LC-MS files that I will use for demonstration are publicly available via PRIDE repository with [identifier PXD007647](https://www.ebi.ac.uk/pride/archive/projects/PXD007647). This proteomic analysis was a part of [the study published by Thulin and Andersson](https://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/AAC.00612-19) in the journal Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. The particular batch that we will be looking at consists of 10 <i>E. coli</i> samples, labeled with TMT tags and pre-fractionated into
# To make our lives easier, I have added the *Results Exporter* node to the consensus workflow in Proteome Discovere 2.4, so that we get a bunch of .TXT output files right in the study directory when the processing is finished. There are not many options in that node, I have marked an option "R-friendly headers" as TRUE.
# The output files are in the sub-directory "PD_Out"
# In[3]:
proteomicTxtFiles = [
os.path.join('/PD_Out', f) for f in os.listdir(os.getcwd() + '/PD_Out') if f.endswith('.txt')
]
for f in proteomicTxtFiles:
print(f)
# For convenience, assign the name or a project number to the data set.
# In[11]:
PNUM = 'Ecoli TMT'
# <h2>Get on the files one-by-one</h2>
# <h3>File InputFiles</h3>
# In[8]:
df1 = pd.read_csv(
os.getcwd() + [ n for n in proteomicTxtFiles if 'InputFiles' in n ][0],
sep='\t'
)
df1['count'] = [1,] * df1.index
print(df1.shape)
print(df1.columns)
df1.head(3)
# The first file is a Proteome Discoverer .MSF file that stores the intermediate processing results:
# In[9]:
df1['File Name'][0]
# The rest of the files are the LC-MS .RAW files, there are eight:
# In[10]:
df1['File Name'][1:]
# What useful info can we find in the InputFiles table?
# In[11]:
list(df1['Study File ID'])
# File IDs follow a pattern F1.x. In Proteome Discoverer, it suggests that we have **one** TMT labeling set, and all eight files are the **fractions** that all belong to the same TMT set. Eight LC-MS files are essentially treated as one big file during data analysis
# In[12]:
df1['Software Revision'].unique()
# These are the versions of Proteome Discoverer (the former) and of the Orbitrap Tune software on the computer that acquired the data (the latter).
# In[13]:
df1['Instrument Name'].unique()
# The first generation Orbitrap Fusion acquired the LC-MS files
# In[14]:
df1['RT Range in min'].unique()
# We could determine the LC-MS file length in minutes, it will be handy for plotting down the line.
# In[15]:
rtRangeMaxVals = [
float( x.split(' - ')[-1] ) for x in df1['RT Range in min'].unique() if type(x) == str
]
rtRangeMaxVals
# In[16]:
maxRT = int( max(rtRangeMaxVals) )
maxRT
# <h3>File MSMSSpectrumInfo</h3>
# In[17]:
df2 = pd.read_csv(
os.getcwd() + [ n for n in proteomicTxtFiles if 'MSMSSpectrumInfo' in n ][0],
sep='\t'
)
df2['count'] = [1,] * df2.index
print(df2.shape)
print(df2.columns)
df2.head(3)
# For an ease of plotting, let's add a categorical column "Identified Peptide" that have two strings as values: "Yes" or "No"
# In[18]:
yes_or_no = lambda x: 'NoID' if x==0 else 'WithID'
df2['Identified Peptide'] = [
yes_or_no( row['Number of PSMs'] ) for _,row in df2.iterrows()
]
df2.head(3)
# In[19]:
print(df2['Mass Analyzer'].unique())
print(df2['Activation Type'].unique())
# The MSMS spectra were acquired with the ion trap analyzer with CID activation.
# Let's look at the success rate of peptide identification. A very low number of PSMs per MSMS may signal problems with the sample prep, acquisition or database search.
# In[21]:
fig1, ax1 = plt.subplots()
df2[
['Identified Peptide', 'count']
].groupby(
['Identified Peptide']
).count().plot(
kind = 'pie', ax = ax1,
y = 'count', figsize = (4,4),
autopct = '%1.1f%%', fontsize = 16
)
fig1.set_facecolor("white")
plt.legend('')
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM} PSMs per MSMS')
# In[22]:
df2[
['Spectrum File', 'Number of PSMs']
].groupby(
['Spectrum File']
).mean().plot.barh(figsize=(8,6))
plt.title(f'{PNUM} ID Rate by File')
plt.legend('')
plt.xlabel('AVG PSM per MSMS')
plt.ylabel('')
# The ID rate varies between the .RAW files, which can be useful for the optimization of the pre-fractionation method. We can also spot if there was something wrong with one or more of the files.
# In[23]:
df2[
['Spectrum File', 'RT in min']
].hist(
by='Spectrum File', bins=maxRT, layout=(2,4), figsize=(14,6)
)
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM} All MSMS Spectra Per Min Per File / Retention time on x-axis')
# These plots show the distribution of all the MSMS spectra over the elution profile. The spectra are acquired rather uniformly over the LC gradient.
# In[24]:
df2[
df2['Number of PSMs'] > 0
][
['Spectrum File', 'RT in min']
].hist(
by='Spectrum File', bins=maxRT, layout=(2,4), figsize=(14,6),
color = '#1ca641'
)
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM} Spectra With ID Per Min Per File / Retention time on x-axis')
# In[25]:
df2[
['Isolation Interference in Percent', 'Ion Inject Time in ms']
].hist( bins=50, figsize=(12,3) )
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM}')
# Isolation interference is the percentage of the ion intensity in the isolation window that does not belong to the "main" precursor in that window.<br>Low values mean less probability of co-isolation of two or more peptides that leads to complicated mixture fragmentation spectra.<br>
# Knowing the distribution of the injection times may be useful for tuning the MS method.
# In[26]:
fig1, ax1 = plt.subplots()
df2[
['Precursor Charge', 'count']
].groupby(
['Precursor Charge']
).count().plot(
kind='pie', ax=ax1,
y='count', figsize=(6,5),
autopct='%1.1f%%', fontsize=14
)
fig1.set_facecolor("white")
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM} MSMS by Precursor Charge')
plt.legend('')
# The distribution of all the MSMS spectra by charge. The 2+ precursors are prevalent.
# In[27]:
df2[
['Precursor Charge', 'Number of PSMs']
].groupby(
['Precursor Charge']
).mean().plot.bar(figsize=(8,3), rot=0)
plt.title(f'{PNUM} ID Rate by Charge')
plt.ylabel('PSM per MSMS')
plt.legend('')
# In[28]:
df2[
['Identified Peptide', 'Precursor MHplus in Da']
].hist(
by='Identified Peptide', bins=100, sharex=True, sharey=False,
layout=(2,1), figsize=(12,6)
)
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM} Precursor Mass Distributions')
plt.xlabel('Precursor MH+ (Da)')
# In[29]:
df2[
['Identified Peptide', 'Precursor mz in Da']
].hist(
by='Identified Peptide', bins=50, sharex=True, sharey=False,
layout=(2,1), figsize=(12,6)
)
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM} Precursor M/Z Distributions')
plt.xlabel('Precursor m/z')
# Same deal with the m/z of the spectra that lead to peptide identifications
# We could segment our table by m/z, let's say, at 100 m/z intervals, and look at ID rates in each segment
# In[30]:
minMZ = df2[['Precursor mz in Da']].min()
print( f'Min {minMZ}' )
maxMZ = df2[['Precursor mz in Da']].max()
print( f'Max {maxMZ}' )
# Let's split it into intervals of 100, this will help to determine which precursor regions are the most effective in terms of peptide identification.
# In[31]:
min100 = int( np.floor(minMZ / 100) )
max100 = int( np.ceil(maxMZ / 100) )
#Generate the dictionary with m/z tuple and corresponding label
intervals = []
for i in range(min100, max100):
intervals.append( [ 100*i, (i+1)*100 ] )
#Pad the string with zeros for better sorting on subsequent plots
intervals = {
(x1, x2): f'{x1:04}-{x2:04}' for x1, x2 in intervals
}
def split_mz(mz, intervals):
intervalString = ''
for k in intervals.keys():
if (mz > k[0]) and (mz <= k[1]):
intervalString = intervals[k]
return intervalString
df2['MZ interval'] = [
split_mz( row['Precursor mz in Da'], intervals ) for _,row in df2.iterrows()
]
df2.head(3)
# In[32]:
fig, (ax1, ax2, ax3) = plt.subplots(ncols=1, nrows=3, figsize=(12, 8))
#PSMs per interval
df2[
['Number of PSMs', 'MZ interval']
].groupby(
['MZ interval']
).sum().plot.bar(ax=ax1, rot=0, color = '#7E94C0')
ax1.set_ylabel('PSM')
#MSMS without ID per interval
df2[
df2['Number of PSMs'] == 0
][
['Number of PSMs', 'MZ interval']
].groupby(
['MZ interval']
).count().plot.bar(ax=ax2, rot=0, color = '#7EC0A9')
ax2.set_ylabel('MSMS Without ID')
#ID rate per interval
df2[
['Number of PSMs', 'MZ interval']
].groupby(
['MZ interval']
).mean().plot.bar(ax=ax3, rot=0)
ax3.set_ylabel('ID Rate')
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM} MSMS With and Without Identifications', fontsize = 20)
ax1.legend('')
ax2.legend('')
ax3.legend('')
# In[ ]:
# Let's get a more nuanced picture the picture a bit and add the charges to the mixture.<br>
# This can be informative for the optimization of precursor selection settings.
# In[33]:
df2[
df2['Precursor Charge'] <= 6
][
['Precursor Charge','Number of PSMs', 'MZ interval']
].groupby(
['Precursor Charge', 'MZ interval']
).mean().plot.barh(figsize=(12,12))
plt.title(f'{PNUM} ID Rates by Charge and m/z Interval')
plt.xlabel('ID Rate')
plt.legend('')
# <h3>File QuanSpectra</h3>
# In[34]:
df3 = pd.read_csv(
os.getcwd() + [ n for n in proteomicTxtFiles if 'QuanSpectra' in n ][0],
sep='\t'
)
print(df3.shape)
print(df3.columns)
df3.head(3)
# In[35]:
df3 = rename_ratios(df3)
#Use the lambda function yes_or_no that we have introduced earlier
df3['Identified Peptide'] = [ yes_or_no( row['Number of PSMs'] ) for _,row in df3.iterrows() ]
df3['Sqrt AVG Reporter SN'] = np.sqrt( df3['Average Reporter SN'] )
df3['Log10 AVG Reporter SN'] = np.log10( df3['Average Reporter SN'].replace(0, np.nan) )
print( [ (i, c) for i, c in enumerate(df3.columns) ] )
df3.head(3)
# In[36]:
df3['File ID'].unique()
# Select the columns with normalized abundance
# In[37]:
df3.iloc[:,17:27].replace(0, np.nan).dropna(axis='rows').head(3)
# Select the columns with non-normalized abundance
# In[38]:
df3.iloc[:,27:37].replace(0, np.nan).dropna(axis='rows').head(3)
# In[39]:
sns.set(font_scale = 1.2)
sns.set_style('whitegrid')
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(ncols=1, nrows=2, figsize=(8, 12))
np.log10(
df3.iloc[
:, 27:37
].replace(0, np.nan).dropna(axis='rows')
).boxplot(
ax=ax1, notch=True, showmeans=True,
vert=False,
boxprops= dict(linewidth=1, color='#1214AD'),
whiskerprops= dict(color='#1214AD'),
medianprops= dict(linewidth=2), fontsize=12
)
ax1.set_xlabel('Log10 Reporter SN')
ax2.set_ylabel('')
#Add the box plot after normalization
np.log10(
df3.iloc[
:, 17:27
].replace(0, np.nan).dropna(axis='rows')
).boxplot(
ax=ax2, notch=True, showmeans=True,
vert=False,
boxprops= dict(linewidth=1, color='#00631C'),
whiskerprops= dict(color='#00631C'),
medianprops= dict(linewidth=2), fontsize=12
)
ax2.set_xlabel('Log10 Normalized Reporter SN')
ax2.set_ylabel('')
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM} Set Reporter SN Before and After Normalization', fontsize = 20)
# In[40]:
normCoeffs = df3.iloc[
:, 17:27
].replace(0, np.nan).dropna(axis='rows').mean().to_numpy() / df3.iloc[
:, 27:37
].replace(0, np.nan).dropna(axis='rows').mean().to_numpy()
print(f'{PNUM} normalization coefficients:')
for p in zip( df3.iloc[:,27:37].columns, list( np.round(normCoeffs, 2) ) ):
print(p)
# See the numeric representation of the normalization. The channel 129C was the weakest, but 1.88 is frankly not that bad.
# In[41]:
df3[ ['Average Reporter SN'] ].describe()
# In[42]:
df3[
['Spectrum File', 'Average Reporter SN']
].groupby(
['Spectrum File']
).mean().plot.barh(figsize=(8,6))
plt.title(f'{PNUM} Average Reporter SN by File', fontsize='large')
plt.xlabel('Averare Reporter SN', fontsize=14)
plt.ylabel('')
plt.legend('')
# Square root scale helps to compress the S/N range while preserving zero values.<br>
# We are very interested to check how many quan spectra have S/N = 0,<br>
# those would have been lost as a result of log-transformation.
# In[43]:
df3[
['Identified Peptide', 'Sqrt AVG Reporter SN']
].hist(
by='Identified Peptide', bins=40, sharex=True,# sharey=True,# log=True,
layout=(2,1), xrot=0, figsize=(10,6)
)
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM} Average SN Distributions')
plt.xlabel('Square Root of AVG Reporter SN')
# Use log10 S/N for hexbin plot, otherwise the zero values can saturate the color map.
# In[45]:
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
plt.rcParams["figure.figsize"] = (12, 4)
hb = ax.hexbin(
x=df3['RT in min'], y=df3['Log10 AVG Reporter SN'],
gridsize=int(maxRT/2),
cmap='coolwarm'
)
cb = fig.colorbar(hb, ax=ax)
cb.set_label('Count')
plt.title(f'{PNUM} AVG Reporter SN vs RT')
plt.xlabel('RT in min')
plt.ylabel('Log10 AVG Reporter SN')
# Spectra with S/N = 0 are excluded from the plot due to log-transformation, which puts emphasis on the quantified spectra.
# In[46]:
df3.plot.scatter(
x='RT in min', y='Sqrt AVG Reporter SN',
s=0.5,color='navy', alpha=0.2, figsize=(10, 4)
)
plt.title(f'{PNUM} AVG Reporter SN vs RT')
# Weak spectra in the dead volume and at the very end are to be expected.<br>
# Are the week spectra (AVG SN < 5) in our data set mostly concentrated at the beggining and at the end?
# In[47]:
df3[
df3['Average Reporter SN'] < 5
]['RT in min'].hist(
bins=maxRT, figsize=(10, 4)
)
plt.title(f'{PNUM} Distribution of Quan Spectra with S/N < 5')
plt.xlabel('RT (min)')
# In[48]:
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
plt.rcParams["figure.figsize"] = (12, 4)
hb = ax.hexbin(
x=df3['Precursor mz in Da'], y=df3['Log10 AVG Reporter SN'],
gridsize=maxRT, cmap='coolwarm'
)
cb = fig.colorbar(hb, ax=ax)
cb.set_label('Count')
plt.title(f'{PNUM} AVG Reporter SN vs Precursor m/z')
plt.xlabel('Precursor m/z')
plt.ylabel('Log10 AVG Reporter SN')
# In[49]:
df3[
['Precursor Charge', 'Average Reporter SN']
].groupby(
['Precursor Charge']
).mean().plot.bar(figsize=(8,3), rot=0)
plt.title(f'{PNUM} Average Reporter S/N by Charge')
plt.ylabel('AVG Reporter SN')
plt.legend('')
# <h3>File PSMs</h3>
# In[50]:
df4 = pd.read_csv(
os.getcwd() + [ n for n in proteomicTxtFiles if 'PSMs' in n ][0],
sep='\t'
)
print(df4.shape)
print(df4.columns)
df4.head(3)
# In[51]:
df4.plot.scatter(
x='MHplus in Da', y='Ions Score', s=1,color='navy', alpha=0.4, figsize=(10, 4)
)
plt.title(f'{PNUM} Mascot Ion Score vs Precursor MH+')
plt.xlabel('Precursor MH+')
plt.ylabel('Mascot Ion Score')
# SPS match is a measure of quantitative interference for MS3 TMT workflows calculated by Proteome Discoverer.<br>
# It takes the number of the MS2 fragments that have been selected and isolated for MS3,<br>
# and calculates the percentage of those MS2 that match to the annotated MS2 fragments of the main identified peptide.<br>
# Thus, high SPS match % should mean that the interference from unknown peptides is low.
# In[52]:
df4[
['SPS Mass Matches in Percent', 'Isolation Interference in Percent']
].groupby(
['SPS Mass Matches in Percent']
).count().plot.bar(figsize=(8,3), rot=0)
plt.title(f'{PNUM} SPS Match % Counts')
plt.ylabel('Count')
plt.xlabel('SPS Match (%)')
plt.legend('')
# Proteome Dsicoverer calculates the isolation interference for precursors as well.<br>
# This is the percentage of signals within the precursor isolation window that do not belong to the main precursor isotopic envelope.
# In[53]:
df4['Isolation Interference in Percent'].hist(
bins = 20, figsize=(8, 4)
)
plt.title(f'{PNUM} Distribution of Precursor Isolation Interference')
plt.xlabel('Isolation Interference in %')
# The SPS match and precursor interference values are sort of linked, but not very much:
# In[54]:
df4[
['SPS Mass Matches in Percent', 'Isolation Interference in Percent']
].groupby(
['SPS Mass Matches in Percent']
).mean().plot.bar(figsize=(10,3), rot=0)
plt.title(f'{PNUM} Mean Precursor Isolation Interference by SPS Match %')
plt.ylabel('Mean Isolation Interference (%)')
plt.xlabel('SPS Match (%)')
plt.legend('')
# Inspect the precursor mass error
# In[55]:
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
plt.rcParams["figure.figsize"] = (12, 4)
hb = ax.hexbin(
x=df4['RT in min'], y=df4['Delta M in ppm'],
gridsize = int( maxRT/2 ),
cmap = 'coolwarm'
)
cb = fig.colorbar(hb, ax=ax)
cb.set_label('Count')
plt.title(f'{PNUM} Mass Error vs RT')
plt.xlabel('Retention time, min')
plt.ylabel('Mass error, ppm')
# In[56]:
df4.plot.scatter(
x='RT in min', y='Delta M in ppm',
s=1,color='navy', alpha=0.2, figsize=(10, 4)
)
plt.title(f'{PNUM} Mass Error vs RT')
# <h3>File PeptideGroups</h3>
# In[12]:
df5 = pd.read_csv(
os.getcwd() + [ n for n in proteomicTxtFiles if 'PeptideGroups' in n ][0],
sep='\t'
)
df5 = rename_ratios4(df5)
print(df5.shape)
print(df5.columns)
df5.head(3)
# In[13]:
df5['Number of PSMs'].unique()
# Find columns that contain abundance ratios
# In[14]:
df5.iloc[:, 15:24].dropna(axis='rows')
# In[15]:
df5.columns[15:24]
# How many peptides have missing quantitative values?
# In[16]:
peptidesMVFraction = 1 - df5.iloc[:, 15:24].dropna(axis='rows').shape[0] / df5.iloc[:, 15:24].shape[0]
peptidesMVFraction = peptidesMVFraction * 100
f'Peptides with missing quan values: {peptidesMVFraction:.1f}%'
# Multi-batch data sets may have very high prevalence of missing values.<br>
# Single-batch isobaric labeling with too many missing values may raise suspicion.<br>
# One could review the processing parameters, as an example
# Let's look at the variability of the peptide ratios within each protein.<br>
# In the ideal case, we expect peptides within a protein to have very similar intensity profiles.
# In[17]:
dfPeptVar = variability_groupby(
df5[ (['Accession', ] + list(df5.columns[15:24]) ) ].dropna(axis='rows'),
ratio_columns = list( df5.columns[15:24] )
)
print(dfPeptVar.head(3))
np.log10(
dfPeptVar.replace(0, np.nan)
).boxplot(
figsize=(10,5),
notch=True, showmeans=True, vert=False,
medianprops= dict(linewidth=2), fontsize=12
)
plt.title(f'{PNUM} Peptide Variability (%) Within Proteins', fontsize=18)
plt.xlabel('Log10 Peptide Variability (%)', fontsize=12)
#plt.xticks(rotation=45, horizontalalignment='right')
# In[18]:
dfPeptVar.describe()
# Pretty low within-protein-variabilities for peptide ratios, with mean values between 9 and 19%
# We could look at the correlations between the abundance ratios on peptide level.<br>
# Should remain careful while interpreting the correlation:<br>
# as I have described in [my recent blog post](https://towardsdatascience.com/correlation-in-isobaric-labeling-proteomics-926045214f96), the correlation coefficients are highly dependent on the way in which the data has been scaled.
# In[19]:
f = plt.figure(figsize=(7,6))
sns.heatmap(
np.log2(
df5.iloc[:, 15:24].dropna(axis='rows')
).corr(method='pearson').round(2),
square=True, cmap='coolwarm', vmin=-1, vmax=1,
annot=False, cbar=True, linewidth=2, linecolor='white'
)
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM} Pearson Correlations on Peptide Level',fontsize=18)
# A more nuanced depiction with the pairplots
# In[20]:
sns.pairplot(
np.log2(
df5.iloc[:, 15:24].dropna(axis='rows')
),
vars=df5.iloc[:, 15:24].columns,
diag_kind='kde', kind='scatter', markers=',', height = 1.5,
plot_kws={'s': 8, 'alpha':0.7, 'color': 'navy'}
)
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM} Pair Plots on Peptide Level', fontsize=18)
# Let's check the efficiency of the enzymatic digestion
# In[21]:
fig1, ax1 = plt.subplots()
df5[
['Number of Missed Cleavages', 'Confidence']
].groupby(
['Number of Missed Cleavages']
).count().plot(
kind='pie', ax=ax1,
y='Confidence', figsize=(4,4),
autopct='%1.1f%%',fontsize=16
)
fig1.set_facecolor("white")
ax1.set_ylabel('')
plt.legend('')
plt.suptitle(f'{PNUM} Peptides by Missed Cleavages')
# We could also check the cysteine containing peptides. Cysteine residues are usually modified via reduction and alkylation, and it's good to check that the derivatization has been done properly. If not, the abundances of cysteine-containing peptides may be very low in the samples that have experienced issues.
# Let's mark the derivatized cysteine residues in a separate column.
# In[28]:
df5['Cys_Peptide'] = [
'Yes' if '[C' in x else 'No' for x in df5['Modifications']
]
# In[31]:
df5[ df5['Cys_Peptide'] == 'Yes' ].head(3)