feat: zk benchmarks

[sebasti810]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The recent updates enhance the project's benchmarking capabilities by integrating the Criterion library as a development dependency. This introduces custom benchmarks for zero-knowledge proof generation and verification. A new benchmark file defines two key functions that assess the performance of creating and verifying proofs based on an Indexed Merkle Tree, offering critical insights into cryptographic operation efficiency.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
Cargo.toml	Added criterion = "0.5.1" under [dev-dependencies] and introduced a new [[bench]] section for custom benchmarks.
benches/zk_benchmarks.rs	New file defining benchmarks for ZK proof generation and verification, including functions for performance measurement.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Benchmark
    participant MerkleTree
    participant Proof

    User->>Benchmark: Run benchmark
    Benchmark->>MerkleTree: Create Indexed Merkle Tree
    Benchmark->>Proof: Generate ZK Proof
    Benchmark->>Proof: Verify ZK Proof
    Proof-->>Benchmark: Return verification result
    Benchmark-->>User: Benchmark results

Loading

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

‼️ IMPORTANT
Auto-reply has been disabled for this repository in the CodeRabbit settings. The CodeRabbit bot will not respond to your replies unless it is explicitly tagged.

• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)

benches/zk_benchmarks.rs (1)

21-42: Explicit error handling is missing in the benchmarking code.

The function setup_tree_and_proofs is used in benches/zk_benchmarks.rs without explicit error handling, relying on unwrap() which can cause panics. This is acceptable for benchmarking but should be improved for production code.

• benches/zk_benchmarks.rs: Lines where setup_tree_and_proofs is called.

Analysis chain

Function setup_tree_and_proofs looks good.

The function correctly sets up an Indexed Merkle Tree and generates proofs. Ensure proper error handling in the calling code.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify proper error handling for `setup_tree_and_proofs` function.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper error handling in the calling code.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'setup_tree_and_proofs'

Length of output: 1466