Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gosec fixes #41

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2024
Merged

gosec fixes #41

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2024

Conversation

suryagupta4
Copy link
Contributor

@suryagupta4 suryagupta4 commented Jul 19, 2024

Description

gosec fixes

GitHub Issues

List the GitHub issues impacted by this PR:

GitHub Issue #

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code to ensure there are no formatting, vetting, linting, or security issues
  • I have verified that new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I have not allowed coverage numbers to degenerate
  • I have maintained at least 90% code coverage
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • Backward compatibility is not broken

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Ran gosec
    image

Unit-test results:
unit-test-gonvme.txt

Copy link
Contributor

@gallacher gallacher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please run the unit tests and provide the results.

@gallacher gallacher merged commit 1cdf07f into main Jul 19, 2024
4 checks passed
@gallacher gallacher deleted the gosec_fixes branch July 19, 2024 20:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants