-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
unimpl_tools issue about “molecule property prediction” #242
Comments
|
you should load model from your save_path. |
Use './weights' for the initial pretrained weights, which are the default weights provided by UniMol. For your fine-tuned model weights, use './exp'. If you only need to utilize the representation capabilities of UniMol, you can simply use UniMolRepr: from unimol_tools import UniMolRepr
# single smiles unimol representation
clf = UniMolRepr(data_type='molecule', remove_hs=False)
smiles = 'c1ccc(cc1)C2=NCC(=O)Nc3c2cc(cc3)[N+](=O)[O]'
smiles_list = [smiles]
unimol_repr = clf.get_repr(smiles_list, return_atomic_reprs=True) if you want to train model with your own dataset, the best practice is:
|
yes, I use that code single smiles unimol representationclf = UniMolRepr(data_type='molecule', remove_hs=False) |
It seems the smiles is illegal for generate conformations |
Hi @Naplessss , I have a similar question about how to do zero-shot property prediction with pretrained models using |
hello:
I want to know this code in unimol_tools molecule property prediction `from unimol_tools import MolTrain, MolPredict
clf = MolTrain(task='classification',
data_type='molecule',
epochs=10,
batch_size=16,
metrics='auc',
)
pred = clf.fit(data = data)
currently support data with smiles based csv/txt file, and
custom dict of {'atoms':[['C','C],['C','H','O']], 'coordinates':[coordinates_1,coordinates_2]}
clf = MolPredict(load_model='../exp')
res = clf.predict(data = data)`.
This code is a api to use unimol that confuse me.
The thoer question is about one function "molecule property prediction" which why have many version code to do, however, all those not description to different.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: