Mark incoming reports with failed dependencies as INVALID

[preaction]

There are often incoming reports that are clearly not good-faith effort to test the distribution: A misconfigured reporter, an accidental "Yes" answer to the question "Prereqs failed to install, try to continue anyway?", or other things.

There are some ways that a test report will warn about these things:

• https://metacpan.org/source/DAGOLDEN/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-Test-ReportPrereqs-0.027/lib/Dist/Zilla/Plugin/Test/ReportPrereqs.pm#L546-548
• There are more, we should find them...

When we find one of these things, we should process the report in a different way:

• If the report is a pass, it means that either the distribution dependencies can be relaxed, or the distribution's tests do not cover the cases where the dependency is needed.
  • We can add a note to the report explaining this
  • We could grade the report as INVALID or UNKNOWN or even FAIL
• If the report is a fail, it means nothing: The distribution said it required libraries that are not present
  • Grade the report as INVALID

If we are changing the report given to us by the reporter, we need to record the changes so we can track down issues with reporters in the future. See cpan-testers/cpantesters-schema#31