Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Number of physics objects in ntuples not very useful (2012 branch) #44

Open
caredg opened this issue Jul 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Number of physics objects in ntuples not very useful (2012 branch) #44

caredg opened this issue Jul 10, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
@manda07A
Labels
2012 Branch 2012

Comments

@caredg
Copy link
Member

caredg commented Jul 10, 2021

https://github.com/cms-legacydata-analyses/PhysObjectExtractorTool/blob/e4cc1fd506286024763fa3ac8c5691b7b724b5f5/PhysObjectExtractor/src/MuonAnalyzer.cc#L191

This number is not very useful as there is a min pT cut later. The number could actually become confusing (and this probably repeats in other analyzers).
caredg added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 17, 2021
@caredg
fix nummuons and numtaus partially addressing #44
4510f5e
@caredg caredg changed the title Number of muons not very useful Number of physics objects in ntuples not very useful (2012 branch) May 5, 2022
@caredg
Copy link
Member Author

caredg commented May 5, 2022

This needs to be fixed for the other physics objects

@caredg caredg added the 2012 Branch 2012 label May 5, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@manda07A manda07A

Labels
2012 Branch 2012
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@caredg @manda07A