From 36cf6707a5ec6fc8b68139b0399808cd17db8ec3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: barlowrussell <69545573+barlowrussell@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:16:44 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Values.csv re-uploaded ... ... because I could not figure out what I was doing wrong to make the comments end up in the wrong column From ce7f4a485035ee1918408cd98888d5ef08341ca4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: barlowrussell <69545573+barlowrussell@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:19:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] Update README.md Added/changed quotation marks --- maps/README.md | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/maps/README.md b/maps/README.md index b3b0308..84f341d 100644 --- a/maps/README.md +++ b/maps/README.md @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ $${\color{yellow}⏺}$$ | phonological change | 85 | The concepts ‘hand’ and View [interactive map](https://cldf-datasets.github.io/barlowhandandfive/maps/dist.html). -## Was there lexical replacement of hand? +## Was there lexical replacement of ‘hand’? @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ $${\color{gray}⏺}$$ | unknown | 456 | It is unknown whether or not the word fo View [interactive map](https://cldf-datasets.github.io/barlowhandandfive/maps/repl_hand.html). -## Was there lexical replacement of five? +## Was there lexical replacement of ‘five’? @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ $${\color{gray}⏺}$$ | unknown | 69 | It is unknown whether or not the word for View [interactive map](https://cldf-datasets.github.io/barlowhandandfive/maps/repl_five.html). -## What replaced hand? +## What replaced ‘hand’? Values for this parameter are descriptions of the most likely etymology (traced as far back as possible in the Austronesian family) given for the word in the language that came to mean ‘hand’; values followed by ‘?’ are somewhat uncertain; and those followed by ‘??’ are even more uncertain; when no likely etymology has been posited, then the value is given simply as ‘unclear’ (with no preceding etymology). Values are batched into five different categories, referenced by the `Code_ID` column. @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ $${\color{gray}⏺}$$ | unclear | 72 | The word for ‘hand’ derives from a fo View [interactive map](https://cldf-datasets.github.io/barlowhandandfive/maps/hand_replacement.html). -## What replaced five? +## What replaced ‘five’? The same conventions apply here as for the parameter “What replaced_hand?” except that here most entries are given a language-internal etymology. Values are batched into seven different categories, referenced by the `Code_ID` column. @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ View [interactive map](https://cldf-datasets.github.io/barlowhandandfive/maps/fi ## What is the numeral system? -The values for this parameter are taken from Barlow 2023, "Papuan-Austronesian contact and the spread of numeral systems in Melanesia". +The values for this parameter are taken from Barlow (2023), “Papuan-Austronesian contact and the spread of numeral systems in Melanesia”.   | Value | Count | Description --- | --- | ---:| --- From 58f7b20d6f5f68d27e74516be32c525377045d8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: barlowrussell <69545573+barlowrussell@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:30:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] Update README.md Stylistic changes; changed descriptions to match parameters file; changed "Melanesian" / "non-Melanesian"; updated descriptions of numeral system values --- maps/README.md | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/maps/README.md b/maps/README.md index 84f341d..480bc2c 100644 --- a/maps/README.md +++ b/maps/README.md @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ View [interactive map](https://cldf-datasets.github.io/barlowhandandfive/maps/co ## Is distinctness due to lexical replacement or phonological change? -For those languages that lack colexification, i.e. languages with value ‘lexically distinct’ for parameter ‘Is there colexification?’, values for this parameter are ‘lexical replacement’ or ‘phonological change’. However, some languages exhibit both lexical replacement and (partial) colexification; this is possible when there has been replacement of both ‘hand’ and ‘five’ such that the new forms are (partially) colexified: these cases are indicated by rows in ValueTable with an empty value and a comment “(recolexification)”. +For those languages that lack colexification (i.e., languages with value “lexically distinct” for parameter “Is there colexification?”), values for this parameter are “lexical replacement” or “phonological change”. However, some languages exhibit both lexical replacement and (partial) colexification; this is possible when there has been replacement of both ‘hand’ and ‘five’ such that the new forms are (partially) colexified: these cases are indicated by rows in the ValueTable with an empty value and a comment “(recolexification)”.   | Value | Count | Description --- | --- | ---:| --- @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ View [interactive map](https://cldf-datasets.github.io/barlowhandandfive/maps/di   | Value | Count | Description --- | --- | ---:| --- $${\color{white}⏺}$$ | no | 428 | The word for the concept ‘hand’ has not been replaced. -$${\color{red}⏺}$$ | yes | 390 | The word for the concept ‘hand’ has been replaced. +$${\color{red}⏺}$$ | yes | 390 | The word for the concept ‘hand’ has been replaced. $${\color{gray}⏺}$$ | unknown | 456 | It is unknown whether or not the word for the concept ‘hand’ has been replaced.   |   | **1274** |   @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ View [interactive map](https://cldf-datasets.github.io/barlowhandandfive/maps/re ## What replaced ‘hand’? -Values for this parameter are descriptions of the most likely etymology (traced as far back as possible in the Austronesian family) given for the word in the language that came to mean ‘hand’; values followed by ‘?’ are somewhat uncertain; and those followed by ‘??’ are even more uncertain; when no likely etymology has been posited, then the value is given simply as ‘unclear’ (with no preceding etymology). Values are batched into five different categories, referenced by the `Code_ID` column. +Values for this parameter are descriptions of the most likely etymology (traced as far back as possible in the Austronesian family) given for the word in the language that came to mean ‘hand’; values followed by “?” are somewhat uncertain; and those followed by “??” are even more uncertain; when no likely etymology has been posited, then the value is given simply as “unclear” (with no preceding etymology). Values are batched into five different categories, referenced by the `Code_ID` column.   | Value | Count | Description --- | --- | ---:| --- @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ View [interactive map](https://cldf-datasets.github.io/barlowhandandfive/maps/ha ## What replaced ‘five’? -The same conventions apply here as for the parameter “What replaced_hand?” except that here most entries are given a language-internal etymology. Values are batched into seven different categories, referenced by the `Code_ID` column. +The same conventions apply here as for the parameter “What replaced hand?” except that here most entries are given a language-internal etymology. Values are batched into seven different categories, referenced by the `Code_ID` column.   | Value | Count | Description --- | --- | ---:| --- @@ -105,19 +105,19 @@ The values for this parameter are taken from Barlow (2023), “Papuan-Austronesi   | Value | Count | Description --- | --- | ---:| --- -$${\color{red}⏺}$$ | decimal proper | 632 | A proper decimal system. -$${\color{orange}⏺}$$ | decimal modified | 228 | A modified decimal system. -$${\color{yellow}⏺}$$ | quinary | 290 | A quinary system. -$${\color{blue}⏺}$$ | binary proper | 22 | A proper binary system. -$${\color{purple}⏺}$$ | binary+3 | 14 | A binary+3 system. -$${\color{black}⏺}$$ | quaternary | 5 | A quaternary system. -$${\color{gray}⏺}$$ | unknown | 83 | Unknown system. +$${\color{red}⏺}$$ | decimal proper | 632 | A decimal system with atomic numerals ‘one’ through ‘nine’. +$${\color{orange}⏺}$$ | decimal modified | 228 | A decimal system with one or more derived numerals lower than ‘ten’. +$${\color{yellow}⏺}$$ | quinary | 290 | A system that constructs numerals based on the number 5. +$${\color{blue}⏺}$$ | binary proper | 22 | A system that constructs the numerals ‘three’ and ‘four’ based on the number 2. +$${\color{purple}⏺}$$ | binary+3 | 14 | A system that constructs the numeral ‘four’ based on the number 2 but has an atomic ‘three’ +$${\color{black}⏺}$$ | quaternary | 5 | A system that constructs numerals based on the number 4. +$${\color{gray}⏺}$$ | unknown | 83 | An unknown numeral system.   |   | **1274** |     | Value | Count | Description ---:| --- | ---:| --- -⏺| Melanesian | 514 | -▼| Non-melanesian | 760 | +⏺| in Melanesia | 514 | +▼| not in melanesian | 760 | ![num_syst](num_syst.svg) From d028fa1115c364012d6eaff06881dd644bb2be2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: barlowrussell <69545573+barlowrussell@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 14:31:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] Update README.md added "the' --- maps/README.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/maps/README.md b/maps/README.md index 480bc2c..15caf2f 100644 --- a/maps/README.md +++ b/maps/README.md @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ View [interactive map](https://cldf-datasets.github.io/barlowhandandfive/maps/co ## Is distinctness due to lexical replacement or phonological change? -For those languages that lack colexification (i.e., languages with value “lexically distinct” for parameter “Is there colexification?”), values for this parameter are “lexical replacement” or “phonological change”. However, some languages exhibit both lexical replacement and (partial) colexification; this is possible when there has been replacement of both ‘hand’ and ‘five’ such that the new forms are (partially) colexified: these cases are indicated by rows in the ValueTable with an empty value and a comment “(recolexification)”. +For those languages that lack colexification (i.e., languages with value “lexically distinct” for the parameter “Is there colexification?”), values for this parameter are “lexical replacement” or “phonological change”. However, some languages exhibit both lexical replacement and (partial) colexification; this is possible when there has been replacement of both ‘hand’ and ‘five’ such that the new forms are (partially) colexified: these cases are indicated by rows in the ValueTable with an empty value and a comment “(recolexification)”.   | Value | Count | Description --- | --- | ---:| ---