You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
CSL 1.0.2 defines the "pamphlet" type as "A fragment, historical document, or other unusually-published or ephemeral work (e.g. a sales brochure)"
Unless mistaken, Chicago Citation Style 17th edition (Pamphlets, Brochures, and Reports) says: "These types of sources are basically treated like books." -- With examples where the pamphlet/brochure title is in italics.
The current Chicago styles (checked with chicago-author-date, chicago-author-date-fr and chicago-fullnote-biblography) do not have provision for "pamphlet" and fall-back to a quoted title. Is that intended for some reason that I might have overlooked?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Greetings,
CSL 1.0.2 defines the "pamphlet" type as "A fragment, historical document, or other unusually-published or ephemeral work (e.g. a sales brochure)"
Unless mistaken, Chicago Citation Style 17th edition (Pamphlets, Brochures, and Reports) says: "These types of sources are basically treated like books." -- With examples where the pamphlet/brochure title is in italics.
The current Chicago styles (checked with chicago-author-date, chicago-author-date-fr and chicago-fullnote-biblography) do not have provision for "pamphlet" and fall-back to a quoted title. Is that intended for some reason that I might have overlooked?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: