We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
At least we know with FP16 model Communicator's bcast_data does not work.
bcast_data
diff --git a/tests/chainermn_tests/communicator_tests/test_communicator.py b/tests/chainermn_tests/communicator_tests/test_communicator.py index a0ff350..f03fa5d 100644 --- a/tests/chainermn_tests/communicator_tests/test_communicator.py +++ b/tests/chainermn_tests/communicator_tests/test_communicator.py @@ -242,6 +242,12 @@ def test_communicator_cpu(param): check_send_recv(param, False) check_collective_communication(param, False) + communicator = create_communicator(param, False) + communicator.mpi_comm.barrier() + x = np.random.rand(1, 3).astype(np.float16) + x = communicator.mpi_comm.Bcast(x) + print(x) + @pytest.mark.parametrize('param', gpu_params) @chainer.testing.attr.gpu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It is solved by #271 when using pure_nccl
pure_nccl
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
At least we know with FP16 model Communicator's
bcast_data
does not work.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: