table1.tex

    \begin{table}[h!]
    \caption{Parameters relevant to the configuration of referenced simulations. Asterisks denote variables whose values were varied between simulations.}
    %SGS = sub-grid-scale. 
    %TKE = turbulent kinetic energy.
    %$z_m = $distance from the interface for boundary layer conditions, 
    %$\Delta z_m = $averaging width for boundary layer conditions
    
    \label{table:var}
    \begin{center}
    \begin{tabular}{lll}
    \multicolumn{3}{c}{}\\
    \hline
    %\topline % ametsoc
	%\midline % ametsoc
	% XX consider including:	% businger coefficients
	
	$c_d$           & drag coefficient & 0.003 \\
    $c_{p,i}$       & heat capacity of ice      & \\   
    $c_{p,w}$       & heat capacity of water    & \\   
	$dP/dx,dP/dy$   & horizontal pressure gradients & $0.0,0.03$ Pa m$^{-1}$\\
	$dS/dz$   & far-field vertical salinity gradient & 0.5 PSU km$^{-1}$\\
	$d\theta/dz$   & far-field vertical temperature gradient & 0.1 $^{\circ}$C km$^{-1}$\\
    %$e$         & SGS TKE & \\
    %$e*$        & resolved TKE & \\
    $\textbf{f}$    & Coriolis parameter        & \\
    $\textbf{g}$    & standard gravity                  & 9.81 m s$^{-2}$ \\
	$h_x,h_y$       & domain width              & 64 m\\
	$h_z$           & domain height             & 64 m\\ 
	%$L_O$ & Monin-Obukhov length & \\
    $L_f$           & latent heat of fusion     & \\
    $m$         & melt rate &\\
	$P_0$           & surface pressure          & 800 dbar\\
	$Pr$           & Prandtl number      & 13.8\\
	$rdf$           & rayleigh damping coefficient & 0.001\\
    $S$         & salinity, prognostic & \\ % practical
	$S_{\infty}$      & far-field salinity     & $34 - 35$ PSU \\
	$Sc$           & Schmidt number      & 2432\\
	$\textbf{u}$& velocity, prognostic & \\
	%$z_0$ & roughness length & \\
	%$z_1$ & evaluation depth for melt parameterization & 0.25 m\\
	%Greek letters
	$\alpha$        & *ice shelf slope           & 0.01 -- 1$^{\circ}$ \\
	$\beta$         & angle between vector oriented up-slope and North & 90$^{\circ}$\\% -- 2$\pi$\\
    $\beta_m$    & thermal expansion coefficient & \\   
    $\beta_S$    & haline contraction coefficient & \\
    $\beta_T$    & thermal expansion coefficient & \\   
	$\Delta_x,\Delta_y$& horizontal resolution  & 0.5 m\\
	$\Delta_z$      & vertical resolution       & 0.25 m\\
    $\Gamma_{fr}$   & Destabilizing transfer coefficient & $5.7 \times 10^{-3} \pm 10\%$ \\%& \makecell[l]{X\% of the domain is freezing \\ for X temperature case}\\ 
    $\Gamma_{\Theta}$   & Heat transfer coefficient &  \\
    $\Gamma_{S}$   & Salt transfer coefficient &  \\
	$\phi$ & latitude & -70 S \\
    $\theta$    & potential temperature, prognostic & \\
	$\theta_{\infty}$      & *far-field temperature     & $-2.4 - -1.9 ^\circ C$ \\
    $\pi^*$     & modified perturbation pressure & \\
    $\rho$      & in situ density & \\
    $\rho_0$    & reference density & \\
    $\rho_a$    & ambient density & \\
    $\rho_f$    & freshwater density & \\
    $\textbf{\tau}$ & surface shear stress & \\
    \hline
    %\botline % ametsoc
    \end{tabular}
    \end{center}
    \end{table}
    %$L_{O,min}$ & $\Delta z/20$ & \makecell[l]{X\% of the domain reaches $L_O$ minimum \\ for X temperature case} \\
    %$L_{O,max}$ & $20\Delta z$ & \makecell[l]{X\% of the domain reaches $L_O$ maximum \\ for X temperature case}\\ 
    %$z_m$       & max(z(min $d\theta/dz$),z(min $dS/dz$)) & not tested\\ %up to 2 x boundary layer depth