New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should we use a more compact multiaddress format over wire messages? #1270

Open

Xela101 opened this issue Jun 3, 2020 · 0 comments

Labels

Enhancement 👷 Question ❓

Milestone

Xela101 commented Jun 3, 2020

Current protobuf wire MultiAddress format is:
/ip4/77.68.110.78/tcp/4001/ipfs/18n3naE9kBZoVvgYMV6saMZe3GsQiDaWiuhi4ngsz4yYghzBZanWyrCCxbg3QWZmWCK3

We can use a more optimized structure such as:
{
ip, bytes
port, bytes
peerId, bytes
}

and reconstruct on the backend.

Xela101 added the Enhancement 👷 label

Xela101 mentioned this issue

Use libp2p in catalyst #1245

Merged

11 tasks

Xela101 added the Question ❓ label

sudhirtibrewal added this to the Full Consensus milestone

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment