Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tweak score tolerance for regressions #2557

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2024
Merged

Tweak score tolerance for regressions #2557

merged 1 commit into from
Aug 1, 2024

Conversation

lintool
Copy link
Member

@lintool lintool commented Aug 1, 2024

More minor tweaks to fix regression score bounds.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 67.07%. Comparing base (827b75d) to head (f64f438).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #2557   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     67.07%   67.07%           
  Complexity     1481     1481           
=========================================
  Files           219      219           
  Lines         12670    12670           
  Branches       1530     1530           
=========================================
  Hits           8499     8499           
  Misses         3644     3644           
  Partials        527      527           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@tteofili tteofili left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lintool lintool merged commit e70d137 into master Aug 1, 2024
3 checks passed
@lintool lintool deleted the tolerance-tweaks branch August 1, 2024 12:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants