Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
429 lines (308 loc) · 16.4 KB

CONTRIBUTING.md

File metadata and controls

429 lines (308 loc) · 16.4 KB

Contributing to Imath

Thank you for your interest in contributing to Imath. This document explains our contribution process and procedures:

Imath is a sub-project of OpenEXR and follows OpenEXR's governance and contribution policies.

For a description of the roles and responsibilities of the various members of the OpenEXR community, see GOVERNANCE, and for further details, see the OpenEXR project's Technical Charter. Briefly, a "contributor" is anyone who submits content to the project, a "committer" reviews and approves such submissions, and the "Technical Steering Committee" provides general project oversight and governance.

Getting Information

There are two primary ways to connect with the Imath project:

  • The openexr-dev mail list: This is a development focused mail list with a deep history of technical conversations and decisions that have shaped the project.

  • GitHub Issues: GitHub Issues are used both to track bugs and to discuss feature requests.

How to Ask for Help

If you have trouble installing, building, or using the library, but there's not yet reason to suspect you've encountered a genuine bug, start by posting a question to the openexr-dev mailing list. This is the place for question such has "How do I...".

How to Report a Bug

Imath use GitHub's issue tracking system for bugs and enhancements: https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/Imath/issues

If you are submitting a bug report, please be sure to note which version of Imath you are using, on what platform (OS/version, which compiler you used, and any special build flags or other unusual environmental issues). Please give a specific account of

  • what you tried
  • what happened
  • what you expected to happen instead

with enough detail that others can reproduce the problem.

How to Request a Change

Open a GitHub issue: https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/Imath/issues.

Describe the situation and the objective in as much detail as possible. Feature requests will almost certainly spawn a discussion among the project community.

How to Report a Security Vulnerability

If you think you've found a potential vulnerability in Imath, please refer to SECURITY.md to responsibly disclose it.

How to Contribute a Bug Fix or Change

To contribute code to the project, first read over the GOVERNANCE page to understand the roles involved. You'll need:

  • A good knowledge of git.

  • A fork of the GitHub repo.

  • An understanding of the project's development workflow.

  • Legal authorization, that is, you need to have signed a contributor License Agreement. See below for details.

Legal Requirements

Imath is a project of the Academy Software Foundation and follows the open source software best practice policies of the Linux Foundation.

License

Imath is licensed under the BSD-3-Clause license. Contributions to the library should abide by that standard license.

Contributor License Agreements

Developers who wish to contribute code to be considered for inclusion in the OpenEXR distribution must first complete a Contributor License Agreement.

To contribute to Imath or OpenEXR, you must sign a CLA through the EasyCLA system, which is integrated with GitHub as a pull request check.

Sign the form through this link prior to submitting a pull request. If you submit a pull request before the form is signed, the "linux-foundation-easycla" check will fail and a red "NOT COVERED" button will appear in the PR comments. Click that link to sign the form.

  • If you are an individual writing the code on your own time and you're sure you are the sole owner of any intellectual property you contribute, you can sign the CLA as an Individual Contributor.

  • If you are writing the code as part of your job, or if your employer retains ownership to intellectual property you create, no matter how small, then your company's legal affairs representatives should sign a Corporate Contributor Licence Agreement. If your company already has a signed CCLA on file, ask your local CLA manager to add you (via your GitHub account name/email address) to your company's "approved" list.

The downloadable PDF's on the EasyCLA page are provided for reference only. To execute the signature, sign the form online through the relevant links.

The OpenEXR CLAs are the standard forms used by Linux Foundation projects and recommended by the ASWF TAC.

Commit Sign-Off

Every commit must be signed off. That is, every commit log message must include a “Signed-off-by” line (generated, for example, with “git commit --signoff”), indicating that the committer wrote the code and has the right to release it under the BSD-3-Clause license. See https://github.com/AcademySoftwareFoundation/tac/blob/main/process/contributing.md#contribution-sign-off for more information on this requirement.

Development Workflow

Git Basics

Working with Imath requires understanding a significant amount of Git and GitHub based terminology. If you’re unfamiliar with these tools or their lingo, please look at the GitHub Glossary or browse GitHub Help.

To contribute, you need a GitHub account. This is needed in order to push changes to the upstream repository, via a pull request.

You will also need Git installed on your local development machine. If you need setup assistance, please see the official Git Documentation.

Repository Structure and Commit Policy

The Imath repository uses a simple branching and merging strategy.

All development work is done directly on the main branch. The main branch represents the bleeding-edge of the project and most contributions should be done on top of it.

After sufficient work is done on the main branch and the Imath leadership determines that a release is due, we will bump the relevant internal versioning and tag a commit with the corresponding version number, e.g. v2.0.1. Each minor version also has its own “Release Branch”, e.g. RB-1.1. This marks a branch of code dedicated to that major.minor version, which allows upstream bug fixes to be cherry-picked to a given version while still allowing the main branch to continue forward onto higher versions. This basic repository structure keeps maintenance low, while remaining simple to understand.

To reiterate, the main branch represents the latest development version, so beware that it may include untested features and is not generally stable enough for release. To retrieve a stable version of the source code, use one of the release branches.

The Git Workflow

This development workflow is sometimes referred to as OneFlow. It leads to a simple, clean, linear edit history in the repo.

The Imath GitHub repo allows rebase merging and disallows merge commits and squash merging. This ensures that the repo edit history remains linear, avoiding the "bubbles" characteristic of the GitFlow workflow.

Use the Fork, Luke.

In a typical workflow, you should fork the Imath repository to your account. This creates a copy of the repository under your user namespace and serves as the “home base” for your development branches, from which you will submit pull requests to the upstream repository to be merged.

Once your Git environment is operational, the next step is to locally clone your forked Imath repository, and add a remote pointing to the upstream Imath repository. These topics are covered in the GitHub documentation Cloning a repository and Configuring a remote for a fork, but again, if you need assistance feel free to reach out on the [email protected] mail list.

Pull Requests

Contributions should be submitted as Github pull requests. See Creating a pull request if you're unfamiliar with this concept.

The development cycle for a code change should follow this protocol:

  1. Create a topic branch in your local repository, following the naming format "feature/" or "bugfix/".

  2. Make changes, compile, and test thoroughly. Code style should match existing style and conventions, and changes should be focused on the topic the pull request will be addressing. Make unrelated changes in a separate topic branch with a separate pull request.

  3. Push commits to your fork.

  4. Create a Github pull request from your topic branch.

  5. Pull requests will be reviewed by project committers and contributors, who may discuss, offer constructive feedback, request changes, or approve the work.

  6. Upon receiving the required number of committer approvals (as outlined in Required Approvals), a committer other than the PR contributor may merge changes into the main branch.

Code Review and Required Approvals

Modifications of the contents of the Imath repository are made on a collaborative basis. Anyone with a GitHub account may propose a modification via pull request and it will be considered by the project committers.

Pull requests must meet a minimum number of committer approvals prior to being merged. Rather than having a hard rule for all PRs, the requirement is based on the complexity and risk of the proposed changes, factoring in the length of time the PR has been open to discussion. The following guidelines outline the project's established approval rules for merging:

  • Core design decisions, large new features, or anything that might be perceived as changing the overall direction of the project should be discussed at length in the mail list or TSC meetings before any PR is submitted, in order to solicit feedback, try to get as much consensus as possible, and alert all the stakeholders to be on the lookout for the eventual PR when it appears.

  • Trivial changes that don't affect functionality (typos, docs, tests) can be approved by the committer without review, after waiting at least 48 hours.

  • Big changes that can alter behavior, add major features, or present a high degree of risk should be signed off by TWO committers, ideally one of whom should be the "owner" for that section of the codebase (if a specific owner has been designated). If the person submitting the PR is him/herself the "owner" of that section of the codebase, then only one additional committer approval is sufficient. But in either case, a 48 hour minimum is helpful to give everybody a chance to see it, unless it's a critical emergency fix (which would probably put it in the previous "small fix" category, rather than a "big feature").

  • Escape valve: big changes can nonetheless be merged by a single committer if the PR has been open for over two weeks without any unaddressed objections from other committers. At some point, we have to assume that the people who know and care are monitoring the PRs and that an extended period without objections is really assent.

Approval must be from committers who are not authors of the change. If one or more committers oppose a proposed change, then the change cannot be accepted unless:

  • Discussions and/or additional changes result in no committers objecting to the change. Previously-objecting committers do not necessarily have to sign-off on the change, but they should not be opposed to it.

  • The change is escalated to the TSC and the TSC votes to approve the change. This should only happen if disagreements between committers cannot be resolved through discussion.

Committers may opt to elevate significant or controversial modifications to the TSC by assigning the tsc-review label to a pull request or issue. The TSC should serve as the final arbiter where required.

Test Policy

All functionality in the library must be covered by an automated test. Each library has a companion Test project, e.g. ImathTest, HalfTest, PyImathTest. This test suite is collectively expected to validate the behavior of very part of the library.

  • All new functionality should be accompanied by a test that validates its behavior.

  • Any change to existing functionality should have tests added if they don't already exist.

The test should should be run, via:

% make test

before submitting a pull request.

Coding Style

Formatting

The coding style of the library source code is enforced via Clang format, with the configuration defined in .clang-format.

When modifying existing code, follow the surrounding formatting conventions so that new or modified code blends in with the current code.

  • Indent with spaces, never tabs. Each indent level should be 4 spaces.

  • Function return types go on a separate line:

      template <class T>
      constexpr inline T
      abs (T a)
      {
          return (a > T (0)) ? a : -a;
      }
    
  • Use a space between function names and the following parentheses unless there are no arguments: V3f v (0.0); v.normalize();

  • Place curly braces on their own lines:

Naming Conventions

  • In general, classes and template type names should start with upper case and capitalize new words: class CustomerList;

  • In general, local variables should use camelCase. Macros and constants should use ALL_CAPS.

  • Member fields in a class should start with an underscore. No other variables should begin with underscore.

File conventions

C++ implementation should be named *.cpp. Headers should be named .h.

All headers should contain:

#pragma once

Type Conventions

To clarify the intention, prefer to cast between types using static_cast<>() rather than the basic C-style () notation:

// good:
size_t x = static_cast <size_t> (y);

// bad:
x = (size_t) y;
x = size_t (y);

Prefer to use std::numeric_limits<> instead of preprocessor define's such as INT_MAX:

// good:
if (x > std::numeric_limits<int>::max())
    std::cout << "That's too freakin' high.\n";

// bad:
if (x > INT_MAX)

Copyright Notices

All new source files should begin with a copyright and license stating:

//
// SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
// Copyright (c) Contributors to the OpenEXR Project. 
//

Third-party libraries

Prefer C++11 std over boost where possible. Use boost classes you already see in the code base, but check with the project leadership before adding new boost usage.

Comments and Doxygen

Comment philosophy: try to be clear, try to help teach the reader what's going on in your code.

Prefer C++ comments (starting line with //) rather than C comments (/* ... */).

For public APIs, use Doxygen-style comments (start with ///), such as:

/// Explanation of a class.  Note THREE slashes!
/// Also, you need at least two lines like this.  If you don't have enough
/// for two lines, make one line blank like this:
///
class myclass {
    ....
    float foo;  ///< Doxygen comments on same line look like this
}

Versioning Policy and Release Process

Imath follows the same policy and release process at OpenEXR. See the OpenEXR CONTRIBUTING.md for the details.