You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We would like to understand changes over time to the Littlepay Product and Group details for each agency we work with. This has come up recently as we learned about a change to a Product ID after that Product was duplicated to create a new Product -- we didn't expect this to create a TWO new Products 🤷
So we'd like to capture the output of our littlepay groups and littlepay products CLI commands, in CSV files stored in this repository, to be able to assess those changes over time more easily.
Acceptance Criteria
For each agency in production (MST, SacRT, SBMTD as of opening this issue)
On some schedule (at least once per day)
Run littlepay groups and littlepay products
Store the data in a corresponding CSV file in this repository: data/[agency slug]_[groups|products].csv
Going with once per day in the evening (roughly 10-11pm Pacific) for now -- this will capture any changes made throughout the day, and we'll note the timestamp of when we capture the changes to hopefully make later analysis a little easier.
We would like to understand changes over time to the Littlepay Product and Group details for each agency we work with. This has come up recently as we learned about a change to a Product ID after that Product was duplicated to create a new Product -- we didn't expect this to create a TWO new Products 🤷
So we'd like to capture the output of our
littlepay groups
andlittlepay products
CLI commands, in CSV files stored in this repository, to be able to assess those changes over time more easily.Acceptance Criteria
littlepay groups
andlittlepay products
data/[agency slug]_[groups|products].csv
GroupResponse
andProductResponse
objectslittlepay groups products
in a CSV file in this repository:data/[agency slug]_linked_groups_products.csv
group_id, product_id
Additional context
Sort of related to the work in cal-itp/benefits#1889, can be implemented in workflow in a similar fashion.
More about the git scraping technique.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: