Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optionally caching the table metadata #62

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cabol
Copy link
Owner

@cabol cabol commented Oct 29, 2023

No description provided.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 29, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #62 (2c8799d) into master (82560f5) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master       #62   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            8         9    +1     
  Lines          485       517   +32     
=========================================
+ Hits           485       517   +32     
Flag Coverage Δ
otp-25.x ?
otp-26.x 100.00% <100.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
src/shards.erl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/shards_group.erl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/shards_lib.erl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/shards_meta.erl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/shards_meta_cache.erl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/shards_opts.erl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/shards_partition.erl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/shards_partition_sup.erl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@cabol cabol force-pushed the feature/metadata_cache_via_persistent_term branch from 9a2f4bd to 2c8799d Compare October 29, 2023 17:56
@cabol cabol force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 0d5aff2 to 4ef2fbc Compare May 25, 2024 11:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants