You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While Operating, I have had multiple times where a ranger would come up to the window and ask for an "incident number" in an unclear fashion. This was either asking for the IMS number for something or talking about a previous report they had submitted. The moment of confusion is something we can mitigate by changing the name to be something clearly distinct.
I propose using "Field incident reports" (FIRs) instead, in all places that they are referenced - the Ranger accessible page to generate them, the IMS entries themselves, and the backend list of FIRs themselves.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While Operating, I have had multiple times where a ranger would come up to the window and ask for an "incident number" in an unclear fashion. This was either asking for the IMS number for something or talking about a previous report they had submitted. The moment of confusion is something we can mitigate by changing the name to be something clearly distinct.
I propose using "Field incident reports" (FIRs) instead, in all places that they are referenced - the Ranger accessible page to generate them, the IMS entries themselves, and the backend list of FIRs themselves.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: