You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When you click to expand on a (mutable) string-dict, it looks like this:
However, this presentation doesn't make any sense. This is not an array. The order doesn't matter. And the items are paired up. It should instead give a key-value presentation, e.g., "" is associated with[mutable-string-dict: "y", 1, "", 0, "ny", 2, "any", 3, "tany", 4], etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It makes exactly as little sense as the syntax [mutable-string-dict: "", 2, "y", 1, "ny", 1, "any", 2, "tany", 3] does...but at least they're consistent.
Well, arguably it makes a bit less sense. But anyway, the point is not to argue that we need a better constructor syntax, but rather that we need better presentation syntax for dictionaries.
When you click to expand on a (mutable) string-dict, it looks like this:
However, this presentation doesn't make any sense. This is not an array. The order doesn't matter. And the items are paired up. It should instead give a key-value presentation, e.g.,
""
is associated with[mutable-string-dict: "y", 1, "", 0, "ny", 2, "any", 3, "tany", 4]
, etc.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: